The American journal of emergency medicine
-
The mortality of severe asthma with cardiac arrest is still close to 100% even if it is treated with conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CCPR). Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) has been widely accepted as an alternative method when CCPR is futile. However, the maximum "low-flow" duration has not been well defined. ⋯ He was withdrawn from extracorporeal membrane oxygenator and ventilator at 72 h and 14 days after admission respectively and was discharged without permanent neurologic sequelae. This case illustrates the critical role of ECPR as a last resort in near-fatal asthma. For such patients with bystander, starting ECPR after >60 min of CCPR can still obtain satisfactory prognoses.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial
Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound to confirm endotracheal tube depth.
Endotracheal intubation is commonly performed in the Emergency Department. Traditional measures for estimating and confirming the endotracheal tube (ETT) depth may be inaccurate or lead to delayed recognition. Ultrasound may offer a rapid tool to confirm ETT depth at the bedside. ⋯ Ultrasound was moderately accurate for identifying the ETT location in a cadaveric model and was more accurate when sonographers felt confident with their visualization. Future research should determine the accuracy of combining transtracheal ultrasound with lung sliding and other modifications to improve the accuracy.
-
Atrial fibrillation (Afib) with rapid ventricular response (RVR) is acutely treated with intravenous push (IVP) metoprolol (MET) or diltiazem (DIL). In heart failure (HF) patients, diltiazem is not recommended due to negative inotropic effects. Studies comparing the treatment of atrial fibrillation often exclude HF. Hirschy et al. evaluated HF patients with concomitant Afib with RVR who received IVP metoprolol or diltiazem to determine their effectiveness and safety. They found similar safety and effectiveness outcomes between the two groups. ⋯ Acute management of patients with Afib with RVR and HF is challenging. While successful rate control at 30 min was not significantly different between diltiazem and metoprolol, IVP diltiazem reduced HR more quickly and reduced HR by 20% or greater more frequently than IVP metoprolol with no safety outcome differences. Further studies are needed to evaluate diltiazem's safety in patients with Afib and HF.