The American journal of emergency medicine
-
Established protocols for implementing high-quality targeted temperature management (TTM) provide guidance concerning the cooling rate, duration of maintenance, and rewarming speed. However, whether compliant to TTM protocols results in improved survival and better neurological recovery has not been examined. ⋯ Among cardiac arrest survivors undergoing TTM, those who did not receive TTM that in compliance with the protocol were more likely to experience poor neurological recovery than those whose TTM fully complied with the protocols. The most frequently identified deviation was a prolonged duration to reaching the target temperature.
-
Review Meta Analysis
Defibrillation strategies for patients with refractory ventricular fibrillation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
The aim of this study was to summarize the existing evidence about the effectiveness of double defibrillation (DD) in comparison to standard defibrillation for patients with refractory ventricular fibrillation (RVF). DD encompasses double "sequential" external defibrillation (DSeq-D) and double "simultaneous" defibrillation (DSim-D), with the study also shedding light on the respective effects of DSeq-D and DSim-D. ⋯ The benefit of DSeq-D in survival to hospital discharge for RVF patients was found in the RCT, but not in cohort studies. Additionally, DSim-D should be applied with greater caution for RVF patients. Further validation is needed through larger-scale and higher-quality trials.
-
Comparative Study
Comparative safety and efficacy of a hybrid intravenous and oral diltiazem protocol for acute rate control in the emergency department.
Intravenous diltiazem has experienced numerous supply shortages over the past few years. The purpose of this study was to compare the safety and efficacy of a traditional diltiazem intravenous bolus and continuous infusion protocol to a diltiazem intravenous bolus and oral maintenance protocol for acute rate control in the emergency department. ⋯ Results of this study demonstrated no difference in acute rate control when using a hybrid IV and oral diltiazem protocol, compared to a traditional IV bolus and infusion strategy. This information supports the further use of a hybrid diltiazem IV and oral protocol, which provides increased flexibility during shortages of either medication.