Anaesthesia and intensive care
-
Anaesth Intensive Care · Jun 1999
Incidents in obstetric anaesthesia and analgesia: an analysis of 5000 AIMS reports.
We aimed to explore the first 5000 incidents reported to the Australian Incident Monitoring Study (AIMS) involving anaesthesia for obstetric patients and found 203 such incidents. Analysis and classification identified seven main incident groups; regional anaesthetic techniques (33%), anaesthetic equipment problems (13%), "wrong drug" errors (10%), other drug-related problems (16%), difficult/failed intubation (9%), problems with the endotracheal tube (9%) and other problems (10%). When compared to the incidents in the main database, obstetric cases were found to be over-represented with respect to accidental dural puncture, post dural puncture headache, failed intubation in emergency situations and the incidence of certain types of "wrong drug" error. The implications of these reports regarding safe practice of obstetric anaesthesia are discussed.
-
Anaesth Intensive Care · Jun 1999
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study Clinical TrialSafety and efficacy of target controlled infusion (Diprifusor) vs manually controlled infusion of propofol for anaesthesia.
In this multi-centre, randomized trial, we compared the safety and efficacy of Diprifusor TCI with manually controlled infusion (MCI) of propofol for anaesthesia. With approval, 123 adult male and female patients were studied. Firstly, each investigator anaesthetized five patients to familiarize themselves with Diprifusor TCI. ⋯ There were statistically but not clinically significant differences in mean arterial blood pressure and heart rate. Quality of anaesthesia and ease of control of anaesthesia were similar. We conclude that Diprifusor TCI and MCI are similar in terms of safety and efficacy.
-
Anaesth Intensive Care · Jun 1999
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialComparison of 1% ropivacaine and a mixture of 2% lignocaine and 0.5% bupivacaine for peribulbar anaesthesia in cataract surgery.
The purpose of the study was to compare 1% ropivacaine and hyaluronidase 75 units/ml with a 1:1 mixture of 2% lignocaine and 0.5% bupivacaine and hyaluronidase 75 units/ml for peribulbar anaesthesia in cataract surgery. We conducted a double-blind randomized trial involving 100 patients. Group 1 received a peribulbar injection of 8 ml of 1% ropivacaine and hyaluronidase 75 units/ml. ⋯ No statistical differences were found between the two groups regarding any of the study parameters. Both groups had excellent surgical analgesia and akinesia. We conclude that 1% ropivacaine is a suitable agent for single injection peribulbar anaesthesia for cataract surgery.
-
Anaesth Intensive Care · Jun 1999
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialDoes local anaesthetic affect the success rate of intravenous cannulation?
We aimed to assess whether subcutaneous lignocaine affects the success rate of intravenous cannulation using a randomized clinical trial. Pre-prepared cannulation packs, 50% containing local anaesthetic, were used to cannulate consecutive consenting patients presenting to the Emergency Department who required cannulation as part of their routine treatment. Doctors with less than four years postgraduate experience randomly selected a pack to perform cannulation and completed a data collection form after each cannulation. ⋯ Subcutaneous lignocaine did not significantly affect the success rate of intravenous cannulation on the first attempt (P = 0.5). Subcutaneous lignocaine has been shown to significantly reduce the pain of intravenous cannulation. This study supports the use of local anaesthesia for all routine venous cannulation.