Journal of pain and symptom management
-
J Pain Symptom Manage · Jan 1995
Review Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialIntravenous regional sympathetic blockade for pain relief in reflex sympathetic dystrophy: a systematic review and a randomized, double-blind crossover study.
The first aim was a systematic review of intravenous regional sympathetic blocks (IRSBs) in patients with reflex sympathetic dystrophy (RSD). Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of IRSBs in patients with RSD were identified by MEDLINE search (1966 to May 1993) and by hand search of 30 journals (1950 to May 1993). Authors of eligible trials were asked for information on additional trials and for unpublished data. ⋯ Sixteen patients with diagnosis of RSD were recruited, but only nine entered the double-blind phase. The trial was stopped prematurely because of the severity of the adverse effects. No significant difference was found between guanethidine and placebo on any of the outcome measures.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
-
J Pain Symptom Manage · Jul 1994
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialEffect of clonidine on postpartum shivering after epidural analgesia: a randomized, controlled, double-blind study.
In obstetric patients treated with epidural analgesia during labor and delivery, shivering is quite frequent due to stress, vasodilatation, infusion of fluids, low ambient temperature, and the direct effect of solution injected into the epidural space. Sixty obstetric patients who developed shivering after receiving epidural analgesia for delivery were randomly assigned to treatment with clonidine 0.150 mg i.v. (N = 20), meperidine 50 mg i.v. (N = 20), or saline solution (N = 20). Drug administration was double blind. ⋯ Clonidine was as effective as meperidine in controlling shivering and caused a greater reduction in heart rate. Drowsiness occurred after clonidine as well as meperidine. Thus, clonidine proved to be effective in controlling shivering and adrenergic response after delivery using epidural analgesia and produced an acceptable level of drowsiness.
-
J Pain Symptom Manage · May 1994
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialTrial of a topically administered local anesthetic (EMLA cream) for pain relief during central venous port accesses in children with cancer.
Procedure-related pain is a significant problem for many children receiving cytotoxic chemotherapy. In an effort to lessen this toxicity, we studied the efficacy and safety of administering topical local anesthesia using EMLA cream in 47 evaluable children with cancer undergoing implanted central venous port injections. Children (< 21 years old) scheduled to undergo repeated venous access procedures were selected for study. ⋯ Statistically significant decreases in pain intensity scores (P < 0.002) were recorded by both children and investigators during the use of EMLA cream as compared with placebo. There was a good correlation between pain scores recorded by both patients and health care providers using both visual analog scales and categorized pain measurement tools. The topical application of EMLA cream 5% provides highly effective superficial anesthesia, and promises to be extremely useful for pain relief during percutaneous access procedures in cancer patients.
-
J Pain Symptom Manage · Apr 1994
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialEffect of intraoperative ketorolac on postanesthesia care unit comfort.
The efficacy of intraoperatively administered ketorolac for the prophylactic treatment of pain in the postanesthesia care unit (PACU) was examined in a prospective, double-blinded study. Thirty patients undergoing general anesthesia for orthopedic or lower abdominal surgery were randomized into two groups. Both groups received equivalent doses of opioids intraoperatively. ⋯ The ketorolac group reported significantly lower pain scores 1 hr after PACU admission (P < 0.01). Time to PACU discharge was not different between groups. Intraoperatively administered ketorolac is an effective adjunct in the management of postoperative pain.
-
J Pain Symptom Manage · Oct 1992
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialThe evaluation of analgesic effects in cancer patients as exemplified by a double-blind, crossover study of immediate-release versus controlled-release morphine.
We compared the effects of controlled-release and immediate-release morphine preparations in adult patients with moderate-to-severe cancer pain and report methodologic approaches to pain evaluation. The study consisted of a two-phase randomized crossover trial preceded by a titration phase; all phases were conducted under double-blind conditions. To evaluate pain intensity, a visual analogue scale (VAS) and the Present Pain Intensity scale of the McGill Pain Questionnaire were used. ⋯ Use of supplemental morphine solution for breakthrough pain expressed as the percentage of the daily dose of the test drug was 5.5% for the controlled-release drug and 10.9% for the immediate-release drug. Differences in pain scores, side effects, and supplemental morphine requirement between the two groups were not significant. We discuss methodologic issues in double-blind clinical trials of analgesics, in particular the validity of "Patient Preference" as an outcome measure and problems related to the titration phase.