Der Schmerz
-
Since the adoption of the law of March 6, 2017, any German physician can prescribe medical cannabis flowers and cannabis-based magistral and finished medicinal products. No specific indications for prescriptions are provided in the law. The statutory health insurance companies bear the costs once an application for cost coverage has been approved by the Medical Service of the Health Funds. ⋯ The medical associations make the following appeal to journalists: To report on the medical benefits and risks of cannabis-based medicines in a balanced manner. To physicians: to prescribe cannabis-based medicines with caution; to prefer magistral and finished medicinal products over cannabis flowers. To politicians: to consider data according to the standards of evidence-based medicine when making decisions and provide financial support for medical research into cannabis-based medicines.
-
The law on the amendment of the narcotics law and other regulations, which was accepted by consensus by the German Parliament, significantly expanded the options for the use of cannabis-based medicinal products. In individual cases, already approved cannabis-based medicinal products can also be prescribed outside the approved indication at the expense of the statutory health insurance funds (GKV). The cost of treatment with cannabis flowers and extracts as well as dronabinol, which are not approved under the drug law, will also be covered by the GKV upon application. ⋯ In addition, physicians are obliged to participate in an accompanying survey. To this end, they must send data to the Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices providing information about treatment with cannabis-based medicinal products. When prescribing medical cannabis products as defined in the Act of 6 March 2017 amending the law on narcotic drugs and other regulations, physicians assume a special responsibility that goes far beyond the responsibility for the use of authorized finished medicinal products.
-
An online questionnaire about cannabis medication (CAM) was sent to German pain therapists 1 year after the introduction of the new act "Amendment to drug and other regulations" of 06.03.2017. ⋯ The study shows an information deficit in knowledge and handling of selected CAM among physicians. Given the high rejection rate, there may also be a knowledge gap on the side of the health insurances. From a certain number of patients upwards, the non-interventional accompanying survey required by law was deemed to be barely practicable from both a time and an economical point of view.
-
In Germany, physicians who prescribe cannabis-based medicines at the expense of the statutory health insurance are obliged to take part in an accompanying survey. Pain was the most commonly reported diagnosis, making an interim evaluation for the indication of pain feasible. ⋯ Physicians should comply with their legal obligation to participate in the accompanying survey. Pain is by far the most common diagnosis in cannabis drugs. For about one third of these patients, physicians reported a clear improvement in pain. Due to the amount of data hitherto and the limitations in the accompanying survey, the results should not be overinterpreted in terms of efficacy and should always be related to existing reviews. The lower age and higher proportion of men among patients treated with cannabis flowers were remarkable. At 37.6%, the overall drop-out rate was high. The most frequent side effects related to vigilance and are therefore highly relevant in terms of driving ability, work ability and risk of falling. For a differentiated evaluation of treatment success, more data needs to be available.
-
Since March 2017 the law amending narcotics and other legal regulations has made it possible for doctors to prescribe cannabis and cannabis-derived medicines. The introduction of § 31 para 6 of the Social Code Book V (SGB V) allows that patients can be treated with cannabis-derived medicines at the expense of the statutory health insurance if they have a severe illness. ⋯ The possibility of prescribing cannabis as medicine at the expense of the health insurance is an important advance in social law. The § 31 para 6 SGB V should be evaluated as soon as possible. The provisions of SGB V for the reimbursement of off-label treatment should be harmonized with § 31 para 6 SGB V.