Journal of neurosurgical anesthesiology
-
J Neurosurg Anesthesiol · Jul 2001
Clinical TrialMonitored anesthesia care using remifentanil and propofol for awake craniotomy.
Adequate analgesia and sedation with adequate respiratory and hemodynamic control are needed during brain surgery in awake patients. In this study, a protocol using clonidine premedication, intraoperative propofol, remifentanil, and labetalol was evaluated prospectively in 25 patients (aged 50 +/- 16). In all but one patient, no significant problems regarding cooperation, brain swelling, or loss of control were noticed, and it was not necessary to prematurely discontinue any of the procedures. ⋯ Nausea and vomiting were not recorded in any of the patients. Although these findings attest to the safety of awake craniotomy, they demonstrate the difficulty of achieving adequate sedation without compromising ventilation and oxygenation. The learning curve of using a new protocol and a new potent anesthetic drug is emphasized.
-
J Neurosurg Anesthesiol · Jul 2001
Effects of carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum on cerebral hemodynamics in pigs.
Previous studies have shown that laparoscopic interventions are associated with increases in intracranial pressure. However, the consequences on cerebral blood flow (CBF) are unknown. This study investigates the effects of carbon dioxide (CO2) pneumoperitoneum on CBF in pigs. ⋯ Bilateral internal carotid artery blood flow (46.0 +/- 7.4 vs 47.7 +/- 7.1 mL/100g per minute), cortical CBF (263 +/- 115 vs 259 +/- 158 tissue perfusion units), and subcortical CBF (131 +/- 145 vs 133 +/- 149 tissue perfusion units) did not change during CO2 pneumoperitoneum. The current data show that CO2 pneumoperitoneum increases sagittal sinus pressure without changing CBF. Increases in sagittal sinus pressure are likely related to decreases in cerebral venous drainage caused by increases in intraabdominal pressure.
-
J Neurosurg Anesthesiol · Jul 2001
Comparative StudyCould heart rate variability predict outcome in patients with severe head injury? A pilot study.
Despite major improvements in the resuscitation of patients with head injury, the outcome of patients with head trauma often remains poor and difficult to establish. Heart rate variability (HRV) analysis is a noninvasive tool used to measure autonomic nervous system (ANS) activity. The aim of this prospective study was to investigate whether HRV analysis might be a useful adjunct for predicting outcome in patients with severe head injury. ⋯ Referring to the area under the rMSSD ROC curve, HRV might provide useful information in predicting early evolution of patients with severe head trauma. During the awakening period, global HRV and the parasympathetic tone were significantly lower in the worsened neurologic state group. In conclusion, HRV could be helpful as a predictor of imminent brain death and a useful adjunct for predicting the outcome of patients with severe head injury.
-
J Neurosurg Anesthesiol · Jul 2001
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialEffect of a subanesthetic dose of intravenous ketamine and/or local anesthetic infiltration on hemodynamic responses to skull-pin placement: a prospective, placebo-controlled, randomized, double-blind study.
Insertion of cranial pins for stabilization of the head can result in a marked hypertensive response, which may adversely affect cerebral hemodynamics. The efficacy of a subanesthetic dose of intravenous ketamine (0.5 mg/kg) and/or lidocaine infiltration (1%) at pin fixation sites before pinning was studied in a prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trial of 40 patients. The subjects were divided into four groups of 10. ⋯ Significant attenuation of MBP and HR was observed in the lidocaine and ketamine-lidocaine groups (P < .05). A minimal increase in HR was observed in the lidocaine-ketamine group. The current study demonstrates maximum attenuation of hemodynamic responses when a subanesthetic dose of intravenous ketamine (0.5 mg/kg) is administered with 1% lidocaine infiltration.
-
J Neurosurg Anesthesiol · Jul 2001
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialEffect of prophylactic ondansetron on postoperative nausea and vomiting after elective craniotomy.
This prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study was designed to evaluate the efficacy of ondansetron, a 5-HT3 antagonist, in preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) after elective craniotomy in adult patients. The authors also tried to discover certain predictors for postcraniotomy nausea and vomiting. We studied 170 ASA physical status I and II patients, aged 15 to 70 years, undergoing elective craniotomy for resecting various intracranial tumors and vascular lesions. ⋯ Prophylactic ondansetron had a favorable influence on PONV outcome measures such as patient satisfaction and number needed to prevent emesis (3.5). Side effects were similar in both groups. We conclude that ondansetron 4 mg given at the time of dural closure is safe and effective in preventing emetic episodes after elective craniotomy in adult patients.