Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery
-
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg · Nov 2024
Acetabular retroversion and cam morphology are contributing risk factors for posterior hip dislocation independent of the trauma mechanism.
A high-energy trauma impact is generally considered the crucial factor causing native hip dislocation. However, femoroacetabular variations are assumed to contribute to low-energy posterior hip dislocations, especially in adolescent athletes. The study aimed to analyze the femoroacetabular morphology of adults who sustained traumatic posterior hip dislocations, comparing high-energy, sports-related, and low-energy trauma mechanisms. ⋯ Acetabular retroversion contributes to posterior hip dislocation in high-energy and sports-related trauma mechanisms and decreases the likelihood of sustaining concomitant fractures. Acetabular morphology was subordinate to causing hip dislocation following a low-energy impact. Increased alpha angles were identified as a risk factor contributing to posterior hip dislocations, regardless of the trauma mechanism.
-
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg · Nov 2024
Review Meta AnalysisDoes patient-specific instrument or robot improve imaging and functional outcomes in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty? A bayesian analysis.
This study conducted a Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA) to compare the imaging and functional outcomes of patient-specific instrument-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (P-UKA), robot-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (R-UKA), and conventional unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (C-UKA). ⋯ Compared with P-UKA or C-UKA, R-UKA significantly improves the femoral and tibial component alignment in the sagittal plane, although this does not translate into discernible differences in functional outcomes. Comprehensive considerations of economic and learning costs are imperative for the judicious selection of the appropriate procedure.
-
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg · Nov 2024
ReviewPatient-reported outcome measures in studies on hallux valgus surgery: what should be assessed.
In recent years, there has been an increasing demand for patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) to assess the outcome following orthopedic surgery. But, we are lacking a standard set of PROMs to assess the outcome of hallux valgus surgery. The aim of this study was to analyze the chosen patient rated outcome scores used in studies reporting on hallux valgus surgery. ⋯ Level I; systematic review of prospective comparative (level II) and randomized controlled trials (level I).
-
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg · Nov 2024
Meta AnalysisCorrelation of revision rate of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty with total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis of clinical studies and worldwide arthroplasty registers.
The purpose of this study was to elucidate differences and similarities in revision rates amongst studies and national registers featuring total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). Thereby comparability and reproducibility between study and register findings should be created. ⋯ A positive correlation of revision rates of TKA and UKA in studies and registers was found, with overall revision rates of UKA comparted to TKA being 2.29 times higher in clinical studies and 1.96 times higher in registers. Revision rates in registers were 1.56 times higher than presented in clinical studies.
-
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg · Nov 2024
ReviewClinical relevance of patient-reported outcome measures in patients who have undergone total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review.
In orthopaedic research, it is crucial to determine changes that are statistically significant and clinically meaningful. One approach to accomplish this is by calculating the Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID), the Clinically Important Differences (CID), the Minimum Detectable Change (MDC), the Minimal Important Change (MIC), and the Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) values. These tools assist medical professionals in comprehending the patient's viewpoint, enabling them to establish treatment objectives that align with patients' desires and expectations. The present systematic review investigated the MCID, MIC, CID, MDC, and PASS of the most used PROMs to assess patients who have undergone THA. ⋯ Level IV, systematic review and meta-analysis.