Anaesthesia
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study Comparative Study Clinical Trial
A comparative multicentre trial of spinal needles for caesarean section.
We studied 681 patients in a randomised, multicentre, double-blind, parallel group trial designed to assess the incidence of headache following spinal anaesthesia for Caesarean section using four different pencil point spinal needles. The needles used were: Whitacre 25G (n = 170), Polymedic 25G (n = 170), Sprotte 24G (n = 173) and Polymedic 24G (n = 168). ⋯ There was no statistically significant difference between the four groups for PDPH. We conclude that all four needles studied performed satisfactorily and comparably.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
The influence of age upon opioid analgesic use in the patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) environment.
It is often asserted that older patients are more sensitive to opioid analgesics than younger patients but experimental evidence for this assertion remains sparse. Two studies were conducted investigating the relationship between age and opioid analgesic use in the patient-controlled analgesia environment. In study I, the relationship was analysed subsequent to our publication of a study investigating patients' responses to opioid use with patient-controlled analgesia. ⋯ There was a difference in morphine use with the younger patients using significantly more morphine than the older patients (< 60 years). Findings were less clear for patients receiving pethidine but there was an inverse correlation between age and pethidine use as well. Overall, the findings of these two studies supported the common clinical belief that older patients require less opioids than younger patients.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
The effect of co-induction with midazolam upon recovery from propofol infusion anaesthesia.
Forty-eight patients undergoing day-case anaesthesia were asked to complete pre- and postoperative tests of psychomotor function in order to study the influence of co-induction with midazolam in conjunction with propofol/alfentanil anaesthesia on postoperative psychomotor recovery. The study was placebo controlled and double blind with patients receiving either 0.03 mg.kg-1 of midazolam or saline 2 min before induction of anaesthesia with propofol and alfentanil. ⋯ The study confirmed that co-induction with a subanaesthetic dose of midazolam reduced the induction dose of propofol by up to 50%. We conclude that co-induction with midazolam reduces psychomotor recovery in the immediate postoperative phase following propofol infusion anaesthesia.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
Intubating conditions using cisatracurium after induction of anaesthesia with thiopentone.
We studied tracheal intubation conditions produced by the muscle relaxant, cisatracurium, following induction of anaesthesia with fentanyl (2 micrograms.kg-1) and thiopentone (6 mg.kg-1). Sixty patients were randomly assigned to receive cisatracurium in a single bolus dose of either 0.15 or 0.20 mg.kg-1. ⋯ The intubating conditions were better after the larger dose. Our results suggest that when anaesthesia is induced using thiopentone, a dose of 0.20 mg.kg-1 of cisatracurium is recommended to ensure satisfactory intubating conditions.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
The effect of a toothguard on the difficulty of intubation.
Dental damage is the most common reason for complaints against anaesthetists. The purpose of this study was to investigate the common belief that the use of a toothguard at the time of intubation causes intubation to be more difficult. We studied 80 patients, half of whom were intubated with a toothguard in situ and the other half intubated without a toothguard. ⋯ The median time to intubation in the group with a toothguard was 24 s and the median time to intubation in the group without a toothguard was 17 s. The difference of 7 s in the time to intubation was statistically significant (p = 0.0003). As the recorded times also included the time taken to insert the toothguard, we do not regard this result to be clinically significant and believe that anaesthetists should think carefully before disregarding this simple protective device.