Anaesthesia
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
A comparison of the nasal mask and the nasopharyngeal airway in paediatric chair dental anaesthesia.
This study compared the quality of anaesthesia and surgical access afforded by two techniques for the administration of anaesthesia during paediatric chair dental procedures. A total of 50 ASA 1 paediatric day case patients were randomly assigned to receive anaesthesia through either the traditional Goldman nasal mask or through a nasopharyngeal airway. ⋯ Operating conditions were universally graded as excellent in the nasopharyngeal airway group, while those in the nasal mask group were graded as excellent/good in only 79% of cases (p < 0.0001). These results suggest that better quality anaesthesia and operating conditions can be achieved by using a nasopharyngeal airway rather than the traditional nasal mask for the administration of anaesthesia to paediatric chair dental patients.
-
Despite common clinical opinion that patient-controlled analgesia should be renamed 'patient-controlled nausea', there is little evidence in support of the notion that postoperative nausea and vomiting are exacerbated by the method. Indeed, data indicate that opioid-sparing techniques are not associated with less postoperative nausea and vomiting. Although some evidence suggests that certain opioids are less emetogenic than others, this too does not stand scrutiny when compared across patients, although research is still required to find whether individual patients are better treated with a particular opioid. Similarly, the emerging practice of combining anti-emetics with patient-controlled analgesia needs wider study before it can be supported.
-
A patient with a previous surgical history of a cleft lip and palate repair and a pharyngeal flap pharyngoplasty was admitted for repair of mandibular prognathism. Following induction of anaesthesia, it was impossible to advance the nasotracheal tube into the oropharynx. Using a dental mirror and retrograde tracheal intubation equipment, under direct vision, the nasotracheal tube was finally advanced into the oropharynx.
-
The effects of prescribing guidelines for analgesia were assessed by auditing prescriptions for opioids before and after the introduction of hospital prescribing guidelines. Opioid prescriptions were collected by the pharmacy department over a 2-week period in November 1994 and repeated in November 1995. ⋯ There was a statistically significant decrease in the number of prescriptions that were inadequate for both dose and frequency according to both the British National Formulary recommendations (18-3%; p < 0.001) and our Acute Pain Service guidelines (36-17%; p = 0.001). The use of accessible prescribing guidelines promotes demonstrable improvements in opioid prescribing.