Anaesthesia
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Randomised double-blind comparison of morphine vs. a morphine-alfentanil combination for patient-controlled analgesia.
In a randomised, double-blind study, we compared a combination of morphine and alfentanil with morphine alone for patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) after Caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia. After surgery, patients were randomly allocated to receive PCA with a bolus dose of either morphine 0.75 mg plus alfentanil 0.125 mg (Group MA, n = 40) or morphine 1.5 mg alone (Group M, n = 37) with a lockout interval of 8 min and no hourly dose limit. Clinical assessments were made in the first 24 h, after which patients completed a written questionnaire. ⋯ There was a low incidence of side-effects in both groups. In the questionnaire, patients in Group MA scored higher compared with Group M when asked to grade speed of onset and effectiveness of analgesia after a PCA bolus; there were no differences in grading for duration of analgesia or overall patient satisfaction. Addition of alfentanil to morphine may have advantages for PCA.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Thoracic epidural infusions for post-thoracotomy pain: a comparison of fentanyl-bupivacaine mixtures vs. fentanyl alone.
A randomised double-blind clinical trial was conducted on 106 patients scheduled for pulmonary resection. Patients received an epidural infusion containing 0.1%, 0.2% bupivacaine or saline in combination with fentanyl 10 microgram.ml -1. Adequacy of analgesia was assessed at rest and during movement over 24 h. ⋯ There were no between-group differences in the number of episodes of hypotension or in the number of interventions for hypotension. However, the use of intra-operative vasopressor and the incidence of temporary neurological complications was higher in the 0.2% bupivacaine group (p < 0.05). We conclude that, in the early postoperative period, the addition of bupivacaine 0.1% improves fentanyl epidural analgesia in patients undergoing lung resection and is not associated with the disadvantages seen with the addition of bupivacaine 0.2%.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
Nefopam and clonidine in the prevention of postanaesthetic shivering.
Postanaesthetic shivering affects up to 70% of patients after general anaesthesia, and may be very distressing. Various drugs have been used to treat or prevent postanaesthetic shivering, but the ideal one has not yet been found. Sixty patients undergoing elective abdominal or orthopaedic surgery under general anaesthesia were included in a randomised, double-blind study. ⋯ Mean arterial blood pressure and heart rate were significantly lower in the clonidine group compared with both other groups. Our results suggest that nefopam and clonidine are effective in the prevention of postanaesthetic shivering. However, following clonidine administration the recovery time was prolonged and hypotension was significantly greater than after nefopam.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
Dosage of neostigmine for reversal of rocuronium block from two levels of spontaneous recovery.
Spontaneous recovery, and recovery following neostigmine 20, 35 or 50 microgram.kg-1 administered at 10 or 25% of recovery of the first twitch of the train-of-four, was assessed in 80 patients after rocuronium administration under continued isoflurane anaesthesia. In an additional 40 patients, isoflurane administration was discontinued and neostigmine 35 or 50 microgram.kg-1 was given at 10 or 25% recovery. The administration of neostigmine reduced the recovery times significantly. ⋯ Discontinuing isoflurane did not alter recovery times. The incidence of emetic symptoms did not differ between groups, including one group that received atropine instead of glycopyrronium in combination with neostigmine. We conclude that rocuronium block can be antagonised safely using a neostigmine dose of 35 microgram.kg-1, although recovery may be slightly slower if administered at a first twitch of 10% of control.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
The use of mini-dose suxamethonium to facilitate the insertion of a laryngeal mask airway.
The use of mini-dose suxamethonium to facilitate the insertion of a laryngeal mask airway was investigated. Sixty patients were assigned randomly in a double-blind manner to receive 0.9% sodium chloride or suxamethonium 0.1 mg.kg-1 intravenously, following intravenous induction with propofol 2.5 mg.kg-1. The laryngeal mask was inserted after the first attempt in 87% of patients. ⋯ Fasciculation (17%) and mild myalgia (23%) were common despite the small dose of suxamethonium used. In conclusion, mini-dose suxamethonium facilitates laryngeal mask insertion. Myalgia is common and the technique is not recommended for patients who are prone to suxamethonium myalgia.