Anaesthesia
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Parturient-controlled epidural analgesia during labour: bupivacaine vs. ropivacaine.
In this randomised, controlled study, we compared the hourly dose requirement of ropivacaine 0.125% (group R, n = 16) with bupivacaine 0.125% (group B, n = 16) provided by demand-only (bolus 5 ml, lockout 10 min) parturient-controlled epidural analgesia during labour. The hourly dose requirement was comparable although group R had a lower successful to total demands ratio (p < 0.05). ⋯ No difference in maternal or fetal outcome was detected. We conclude that, at a concentration of 0.125%, ropivacaine and bupivacaine were equally effective when self-administered using this patient-controlled regimen.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Comparison of continuous epidural infusion of ropivacaine and sufentanil with intravenous patient-controlled analgesia after total hip replacement.
We assessed the efficacy of an epidural infusion of ropivacaine 0.1% and sufentanil 1 microg x ml(-1), comparing it with intravenous patient-controlled analgesia using piritramide in this prospective, randomised, double-blind study of 24 ASA physical status I-III patients undergoing elective total hip replacement. Lumbar epidural block using ropivacaine 0.75% was combined with either propofol sedation or general anaesthesia for surgery. Epidural infusion and patient-controlled analgesia were started after surgery. ⋯ The piritramide group experienced significantly more adverse events than the epidural group (p < 0.001), especially hypotension (p < 0.01) and vomiting (p < 0.05). Patients in the epidural ropivacaine group were more satisfied with the pain management (p < 0.05). We conclude that the epidural infusion of ropivacaine 0.1% and sufentanil 1 microg x ml(-1) is superior to intravenous opioid by patient-controlled analgesia in preventing pain after total hip replacement, with fewer adverse effects and greater patient satisfaction.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Adenotonsillectomy in children: a comparison of morphine and fentanyl for peri-operative analgesia.
This study compared the effectiveness and side-effects of intra-operative fentanyl with fentanyl and morphine for elective adenotonsillectomy in a double-blind study, in 60 children randomly allocated to receive either intravenous fentanyl 1 microg x kg(-1) intra-operatively or intramuscular morphine 100 microg x kg(-1) at induction. All children received a standard anaesthetic induction with intravenous fentanyl 1 microg x kg(-1) and propofol 4-5 mg x kg(-1) and maintenance with oxygen, nitrous oxide and isoflurane. Pain scores, emetic episodes and supplemental morphine requirements were recorded for 24 h postoperatively. ⋯ The incidence of postoperative vomiting was lower in the fentanyl group (p < 0.03) in the first 4 h, but similar by 24 h. Children who received morphine at any time in the first 24 h had more median (range) episodes of vomiting [2 (0-7)] than children receiving fentanyl only [l (0-3); p < 0.03]. Administration of rescue anti-emetics, pain scores in recovery and pain scores over the next 24 h were similar between the two groups.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
The effect of an infusion of esmolol on the incidence of myocardial ischaemia during tracheal extubation following coronary artery surgery.
The aim of this randomised controlled study was to determine whether an esmolol infusion affected the incidence of ST segment changes during weaning from intermittent positive pressure ventilation and tracheal extubation after coronary artery surgery. Thirty-one patients received an infusion of esmolol 0-300 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1) and 37 patients comprised the control group. ST segment changes were monitored using a continuous ambulatory surveillance system. ⋯ Mean heart rate was significantly higher in the control group than in the esmolol group from 40 min before until 180 min after tracheal extubation. Seven patients in the esmolol group suffered adverse events related to the esmolol infusion. Although the use of esmolol reduced the incidence of myocardial ischaemia, the incidence of adverse effects makes it unsuitable prophylaxis for patients after coronary artery surgery.