Anaesthesia
-
Failed tracheal intubation due to a difficult airway is an important cause of anaesthetic morbidity and mortality. This study was undertaken to evaluate the effectiveness of the Bonfils intubation fibrescope for tracheal intubation after failed direct laryngoscopy. ⋯ Median (IQR [range]) time to intubation using the Bonfils intubation fibrescope was 47.5 (30-80 [20-200]) s. Tracheal intubation using the Bonfils intubation fibrescope appears to be a simple and effective technique for the management of a difficult intubation.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
Ease of insertion of the laryngeal tube during manual-in-line neck stabilisation.
The laryngeal tube has a potential role in airway management during anaesthesia or cardiopulmonary resuscitation. In patients with unstable necks, the head and neck may need to be stabilised manually (manual in-line stabilisation), but it is not known whether this procedure affects the ease of insertion of the laryngeal tube. We studied, in a cross-over study, 21 adult patients to compare the success rate of ventilation through the laryngeal tube between the Magill position (a pillow under the occiput and the head extended) or the manual in-line position of the head and neck (without a pillow under the occiput). ⋯ Ventilation was adequate in all 21 patients in the Magill position, but only in two of 21 patients during manual in-line positioning (p < 0.01; 95%CI for difference: 68-94%). In the Magill position, insertion of the laryngeal tube was easy in 16 patients and moderately difficult in the remaining five patients; in the manual in-line stabilisation position, insertion was moderately difficult in two patients and impossible in the remaining 19 patients. Stabilisation of the patient's head and neck by the manual in-line method made insertion of the laryngeal tube either difficult or impossible.
-
Letter Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
Sub-Tenon's block without hyaluronidase.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Comparison of Propofol-Lipuro with propofol mixed with lidocaine 10 mg on propofol injection pain.
A common drawback of propofol is pain on injection and lidocaine is commonly mixed with propofol to reduce its incidence and severity. We conducted a randomised, prospective, double-blind study to compare injection pain following the administration of two different formulations of propofol in 200 unpremedicated ASA I-III adult patients scheduled for elective surgery under general anaesthesia. Patients were allocated randomly into two groups to receive either Propofol-Lipuro without added lidocaine or Diprivan mixed with lidocaine 10 mg. ⋯ The incidence of propofol injection pain was virtually identical in both study groups with 37/98 (38%) patients experiencing pain or discomfort following Propofol-Lipuro compared with 35/98 (36%) after Diprivan (p = 0.88). We observed no significant difference in pain scores between the groups (p = 0.67). Moderate or severe injection pain was experienced by 12/98 (12%) patients given Propofol-Lipuro compared with 8/98 (8%) given Diprivan (p = 0.48).