Anaesthesia
-
Randomized Controlled Trial
Effect of penehyclidine hydrochloride on the incidence of intra-operative awareness in Chinese patients undergoing breast cancer surgery during general anaesthesia.
Intra-operative awareness can lead to serious adverse psychological consequences. We conducted a prospective, randomised, double-blinded trial in 920 patients undergoing breast cancer surgery under bispectral index-guided total intravenous anaesthesia to evaluate the effect of penehyclidine hydrochloride on intra-operative awareness. Patients were randomly divided to receive 0.01 mg.kg(-1) penehyclidine hydrochloride or saline intravenously 30 min before surgery. ⋯ We found no differences in depth of anaesthesia and patients' pre-operative anxiety levels between the two groups. The incidence of awareness with penehyclidine hydrochloride (0/456 patients; 0%) was significantly lower than with saline (5/452; 1.1%), p = 0.030. We conclude that penehyclidine hydrochloride reduced the incidence of intra-operative awareness in patients undergoing breast cancer surgery during general anaesthesia.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study
The McGrath® Series 5 videolaryngoscope vs the Macintosh laryngoscope: a randomised, controlled trial in patients with a simulated difficult airway.
We compared the McGrath® Series 5 videolaryngoscope with the Macintosh laryngoscope in a simulated difficult airway, using manual in-line stabilisation in 88 anaesthestised patients of ASA physical status 1-2. The primary outcome was laryngoscopic view. Secondary outcomes included rates of successful tracheal intubation and complications. ⋯ In 66 out of 88 patients (75%), the McGrath improved the glottic view by one to three grades compared with the Macintosh (p < 0.001). Intubation of the trachea was successful in all patients using the McGrath, while the Macintosh was successful in 26 (59%, p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the complication rates between the devices.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial
A randomised comparison of InnoScope and Macintosh laryngoscope in simulated difficult tracheal intubation in manikins.
We conducted a crossover randomised study to evaluate the performance of a novel optical stylet, the InnoScope, for tracheal intubation in simulated normal and difficult airways. Twenty-five anaesthetists attempted tracheal intubation on a SimMan 3G simulator using the InnoScope first followed by the Macintosh laryngoscope or vice versa. Three airway scenarios were tested: (1) normal airway; (2) difficult airway with swollen pharynx; and (3) limited neck movement. ⋯ Using the InnoScope, tracheal intubation during the first attempt was only successful in 48% of cases with difficult airway. In this scenario, the median (interquartile range [range]) duration of tracheal intubation was significantly longer with [corrected] InnoScope compared with the Macintosh laryngoscope, (70 (19-120 [15-120)] s vs 30 [21-58 (15-120)] s, [corrected] p = 0.01. We conclude that an improved laryngeal view with the use of the InnoScope did not translate into better conditions for tracheal intubation.