Anaesthesia
-
We have evaluated the effect of a colloid solution on acute kidney injury in paediatric cardiac surgery. A total of 195 patients were ramdomly divided into an hydroxyethyl starch group and a control group. In the starch group, 6% hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 (Volulyte® ) was used as the primary fluid for volume resuscitation but was limited to 30 ml.kg-1. ⋯ There was no difference in transfusion between the two groups. Patients with acute kidney injury had worse clinical courses than those without acute kidney injury. We conclude that intra-operative use of 6% hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 up to 30 ml.kg-1 was not associated with postoperative acute kidney injury in paediatric cardiac patients.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial
Cuffed vs. uncuffed tracheal tubes in children: a randomised controlled trial comparing leak, tidal volume and complications.
What did they do?
Chambers et al. compared ventilation parameters and respiratory complications in 104 children randomly allocated to ventilation with either a cuffed or non-cuffed ETT. They primarily investigated airway leak as measured by the difference between inspiratory and expiratory volumes.
And they found?
For both volume and pressure-controlled ventilation, leakage was lower for cuffed tubes than uncuffed. Notably leak was stable with cuffed tubes and PCV, but progressively increased over 30 minutes after intubation with an uncuffed tube.
Cuffed tubes required fewer intubations and changes, and resulted in fewer short-term complications (coughing, desaturation, hoarseness or sore throat).
Take-home message
Modern cuffed paediatric endotracheal tubes offer significant clinical advantages over uncuffed ETTs.
summary -
Randomized Controlled Trial
Effect of sufentanil on bispectral index in the elderly.
We examined the impact of adding sufentanil during anaesthesia induction with propofol on bispectral index values in elderly patients (≥ 65 years). Patients were randomly assigned to receive a target-controlled sufentanil infusion (effect-site concentration of 0.3 ng.ml-1 ) or matching placebo, followed by a target-controlled propofol induction (initial effect-site concentration of 0.5 μg.ml-1 ; step-wise increase of 0.5 μg.ml-1 ) until loss of consciousness defined as an Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation score < 2. Seventy-one patients (sufentanil 35, placebo 36) completed the study. ⋯ At loss of consciousness, mean (SD) bispectral index value was 75.0 (8.6) with sufentanil and 70.0 (8.0) with placebo; mean difference -5.0 (95% confidence interval -8.9 to -1.1), p = 0.013. Post-hoc analyses suggest that the difference was significant in men only (mean difference -7.3 (-11.8 to -2.6), p = 0.003). Sufentanil co-induction with propofol results in higher bispectral index values at loss of consciousness in elderly patients.