Anaesthesia
-
While haemodynamic variability interferes with the assumption of constant flow underlying thermodilution cardiac output calculation, variability in (peripheral) arterial vascular physiology may affect pulse contour cardiac output methods. We compared non-invasive finger arterial pressure-derived continuous cardiac output measurements (Nexfin® ) with cardiac output measured using thermodilution during cardiothoracic surgery and determined the impact of cardiovascular variability on either method. We compared cardiac output derived from non-invasive finger arterial pressure with cardiac output measured by thermodilution at four grades (A-D) of cardiovascular variability. ⋯ Variability during cardiothoracic surgery affected the comparison between thermodilution and non-invasive finger arterial pressure-derived cardiac output. When the main sources of variability were included, percentage errors were large. Future cardiac output methodology comparison studies should report haemodynamic variability.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study
A comparison of two techniques for induction of anaesthesia with target-controlled infusion of propofol.
Induction of anaesthesia with target-controlled infusion of propofol may be achieved by stepwise increases in effect-site concentration until the patient loses consciousness (titration method), or by setting a high effect-site concentration target and observing the calculated effect-site concentration at loss of consciousness (standard method). When the estimated effect-site concentration at loss of consciousness is accurate, the difference between effect-site concentration at loss of consciousness and at recovery of consciousness should be small. This prospective, randomised, controlled trial was designed to compare this difference (effect-site concentration at loss of consciousness - effect-site concentration at recovery of consciousness) associated with the two techniques. ⋯ The median (IQR [range]) difference between effect-site concentration at loss of consciousness and recovery of consciousness was significantly lower in patients in the titration group at 1.2 (0.8-1.5 [0.1-2.9]) μg.ml-1 compared with the standard group 2.1 (1.9-2.6 [0.2-3.6] μg.ml-1 ; p < 0.0001). There was a positive correlation between effect-site concentration at loss of, and recovery of, consciousness (R = 0.41, p = 0.016) in the titration group, which was not seen in the standard group (R = -0.15, p = 0.44). In conclusion, using the modified Marsh pharmacokinetic model, the titration method for target-controlled infusion propofol at induction of anaesthesia allows closer matching of propofol concentration to depth of anaesthesia than the standard method.
-
Bleeding during and after surgery ranges from trivial to fatal. Bleeding is in part determined by the patient's coagulation status. The UK National Institute for Health and Care Excellence recommends a pre-operative clotting test for patients with a history of abnormal bleeding. ⋯ The activated partial thromboplastin time may be prolonged due to contamination, anticoagulant therapy, clotting factor deficiencies, lupus anticoagulant or acquired inhibitors of specific clotting factors. A prolonged activated partial thromboplastin time should lead to: further testing to exclude heparin contamination or therapy, mixing studies to identify factor deficiencies and if necessary dynamic studies, such as the dilute Russell's viper venom time and the Actin FS-activated partial thromboplastin time, to identify direct factor inhibitors. These tests identify abnormalities and their implications for bleeding, helping anaesthetists and haematologists to manage haemostasis for individual patients.
-
Cardiac events are a common cause of peri-operative morbidity. Cardiopulmonary exercise testing can objectively assess risk, but it does not quantify myocardial ischaemia. With appropriate dietary preparation to suppress basal myocardial glucose uptake, positron emission tomography with 18 F-fluorodeoxyglucose can identify post-ischaemic myocardium, providing an attractive complement to exercise testing. ⋯ Twenty-one participants proceeded to surgery: myocardial injury or infarction was diagnosed in three participants, two of whom had positive or equivocal positron emission tomography but negative myocardial perfusion imaging. We have shown that pre-operative cardiac positron emission tomography after cardiopulmonary exercise testing is feasible; protocol deviations were minor and did not affect image quality. Our findings warrant further investigation to compare the diagnostic utility of cardiac positron emission tomography imaging with standard pre-operative stress tests.