Anaesthesia
-
Multicenter Study
Variation in the practice of tracheal intubation in Europe after traumatic brain injury: a prospective cohort study.
Traumatic brain injury patients frequently undergo tracheal intubation. We aimed to assess current intubation practice in Europe and identify variation in practice. We analysed data from patients with traumatic brain injury included in the prospective cohort study collaborative European neurotrauma effectiveness research in traumatic brain injury (CENTER-TBI) in 45 centres in 16 European countries. ⋯ In conclusion, patient and injury characteristics are key drivers of tracheal intubation. Between-centre differences were also substantial. Further studies are needed to improve the evidence base supporting recommendations for tracheal intubation.
-
Previous studies on the safety of peri-operative transoesophageal echocardiography seem to suggest a low rate of associated morbidity and mortality. That said, there has been a paucity of prospective multicentre studies in this important area of clinical practice. We carried out a one-year prospective study in 2017, co-ordinated by the Association of Cardiothoracic Anaesthesia and Critical Care, to determine the rate and severity of complications associated with peri-operative transoesophageal echocardiography in anaesthetised cardiology and cardiac surgical patients. ⋯ These figures are higher than previously reported and suggest a high probability of death following the development of a complication (~40%). Most complications occurred in patients without known risk factors for transoesophageal echocardiography associated gastro-oesophageal injury. We suggest clinicians and departments review their procedural guidelines, especially in relation to probe insertion techniques, together with the information communicated to patients when the risks and benefits of such examinations are discussed.
-
Multicenter Study Comparative Study
A comparison of four risk models for the prediction of cardiovascular complications in patients with a history of atrial fibrillation undergoing non-cardiac surgery.
It is unclear how best to predict peri-operative cardiovascular risk in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing non-cardiac surgery. This study examined the accuracy of the revised cardiac risk index and three atrial fibrillation thrombo-embolic risk models for predicting 30-day cardiovascular events after non-cardiac surgery in patients with a pre-operative history of atrial fibrillation. We conducted a prospective cohort study in 28 centres from 2007 to 2013 of 40,004 patients ≥ 45 years of age undergoing inpatient non-cardiac surgery who were followed until 30 days after surgery for cardiovascular events (defined as myocardial injury, heart failure, stroke, resuscitated cardiac arrest or cardiovascular death). ⋯ Compared with the revised cardiac risk index (c-index 0.60), all atrial fibrillation thrombo-embolic risk scores were significantly better at predicting peri-operative cardiovascular events: CHADS2 (c-index 0.62); CHA2 DS2 -VASc (c-index 0.63); and R2 CHADS2 (c-index 0.65), respectively. Although the three thrombo-embolic risk prediction models were significantly better than the revised cardiac risk index for prediction of peri-operative cardiovascular events, none of the four models exhibited strong discrimination metrics. There remains a need to develop a better peri-operative risk prediction model.