Annals of surgery
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study Comparative Study
Neoadjuvant Radiotherapy Versus Surgery Alone for Stage II/III Mid-Low Rectal Cancer With or Without High-Risk Factors: A Prospective Multicenter Stratified Randomized Trial.
The aim of this study was to compare stage II/III rectal cancers with or without high-risk factors, and evaluate the effect of neoadjuvant radiotherapy (NRT) in these 2 cohorts. ⋯ Stratification of stage II/III rectal cancers according to risk factors to more precise subclassifications may result in noteworthy differences in survivals and local pelvic control. An extremely low cumulative incidence of local recurrence and survivals in low-risk patients can be achieved with upfront good quality of surgery alone. This trial, owing to the insufficient power, could not prove the noninferiority of surgery alone, but suggest a discriminative use of NRT according to clinical risk stratification in stage II/III rectal cancer.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study Comparative Study
Primary Open Versus Closed Implantation Strategy for Totally Implantable Venous Access Ports: The Multicentre Randomized Controlled PORTAS-3 Trial (DRKS 00004900).
PORTAS-3 was designed to compare the frequency of pneumothorax or haemothorax in a primary open versus closed strategy for port implantation. ⋯ A primary open strategy by cut-down of the cephalic vein, if necessary enhanced by a modified Seldinger technique, reduces the frequency of pneumothorax or haemothorax after central venous port implantation significantly compared with a closed strategy by primary puncture of the subclavian vein without routine sonographic guidance. Therefore, open surgical cut-down should be the reference standard for port implantation in comparable cohorts.
-
With the recent approval of 2 NIRAF-based devices for label-free identification of PG by the Food and Drug Administration, it becomes crucial to educate the surgical community on the realistic scope of this emerging technology. Here, we have compiled a review of studies that utilize NIRAF and present a critical appraisal of this technique for intraoperative PG detection. ⋯ Because NIRAF-based identification of PG is noninvasive and label-free, the popularity of this approach has considerably surged. As the present limitations of various technologies capable of NIRAF detection are identified, we anticipate that newer device iterations will continue to be developed enhancing the current merits of these modalities to aid surgeons in identifying and preserving PGs. However, more concrete and long-term outcome studies with these modalities are essential to determine the impact of this technique on patient outcome and actual cost-benefits.