Journal of evaluation in clinical practice
-
Attending to treatment preferences is an element of person-centred care, reported as beneficial in improving treatment adherence, satisfaction, and outcome, in practice. The results of preference trials were inconsistent in supporting these benefits in intervention evaluation research. Informed by the conceptualisation of treatment preferences positing their indirect impact on outcomes, this narrative review aimed to summarise the evidence on the effects of preferences on enrolment; withdrawal or attrition; engagement, enactment, and satisfaction with treatment; and outcomes. ⋯ The results are attributed to conceptual and methodological issues including less-than-optimal assessment of treatment preferences, which contributes to ill-identified preferences, accounting for withdrawal, low enactment, and limited satisfaction with treatment. These treatment processes, in turn, mediate the impact of treatment preferences on outcomes. It is important to refine and standardise the methods for assessing preferences and to examine their indirect impact (mediated by treatment processes) on outcomes in future preference trials to validly identify their benefits.
-
Contemporary person-centred healthcare and professional education operates within an interconnected and rapidly changing world of challenge and opportunity in the development of curricula that reflect practice. In times characterised by change and uncertainty, with increasing opportunities for networking and collaboration, educational curricula with an emphasis on 'process' rather than a more traditional, mechanistic emphasis on 'product', would seem appropriate in looking towards the future. Learning and emergent professional identity occurs through individuals' social definitions in turn influenced by knowledge and power relationships. ⋯ By way of example, a co-produced module of study within a preregistration MSc Physiotherapy programme is highlighted. Students identify, develop, and design small-group projects working with 'Physiopedia'. Thus, projects hold the potential to contribute to a global educational forum as well as student dialogue for learning.
-
Patients look to their clinicians for explanations and treatments that achieve predictable cures with certainty. Clinicians usually respond accordingly. Acknowledging uncertainty, while necessary, is difficult, anxiety-provoking and at times overwhelming for patients and clinicians alike. ⋯ Through the lenses of evidence-based medicine and complexity sciences this paper critically explores the clinical management of three patients diagnosed as having coronary artery disease. They all received the same treatment even though they presented with very different clinical complaints arising from different disease manifestations. Looking at these case studies the authors reflect on the reasons behind this astonishing, but widely seen medical behaviour of 'one size fits all'. They critically reflect the importance of research and evidence in view of a person-centred solution.
-
Shared decision making (SDM) is the process whereby patients and healthcare professionals work together to achieve a consensus management decision, based on best clinical evidence and patient's preferences. No formal approach to documentation of SDM conversations exists in setting of peri-operative medicine. ⋯ The BRAN tool is adaptable to many health decision settings, including discussions related to treatment, investigations, and procedures, which expands its potential to improve patient safety.