British journal of anaesthesia
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Comparison of patient-controlled analgesia with and without a background infusion after lower abdominal surgery in children.
Forty children aged 6-12 yr undergoing appendicectomy were allocated randomly to receive postoperative i.v. morphine by a patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) system (bolus dose 20 micrograms kg-1 with a lockout interval of 5 min) or the same PCA with a background infusion of morphine 20 micrograms kg-1 h-1. Patients breathed air and oxygen saturation was monitored by continuous pulse oximetry. Scores for pain, sedation and nausea were recorded hourly. ⋯ There were no significant differences in the pain scores of the two groups. Patients with PCA+background infusion suffered more nausea (P < 0.01), more sedation (P < 0.05) and hypoxaemia (P < 0.001) than those with PCA only. They also had a better sleep pattern than those with PCA only.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Single-dose, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy cross-over comparison of extradural and i.v. clonidine in chronic pain.
We studied 10 patients with chronic back pain who had claimed benefit with a previous extradural dose of clonidine 150 micrograms combined with local anaesthetic. We compared a single dose of clonidine 150 micrograms given by either the extradural or i.v. route in a double-blind, randomized, double-dummy and cross-over fashion, with 80% power to detect a difference in the analgesic effect of the two routes. ⋯ Clonidine given by either route produced statistically significant sedation and significant decreases in arterial pressure and heart rate. In this study, extradural clonidine had no significant clinical advantages compared with i.v. clonidine; clonidine 150 micrograms by either route produced a high incidence of adverse effects.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Double-blind comparison between doxapram and pethidine in the treatment of postanaesthetic shivering.
Sixty patients who shivered after routine surgery under general anaesthesia were allocated randomly to receive normal saline (n = 20), doxapram 1.5 mg kg-1 (n = 20) or pethidine 0.33 mg kg-1 (n = 20). Both doxapram and pethidine were effective in treating postoperative shivering 2-3 min after i.v. administration. ⋯ In the pethidine group, all patients had stopped shivering by 7 min after treatment. We conclude that both doxapram and pethidine were effective in the treatment of postoperative shivering.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
Effects of increasing doses of alfentanil, fentanyl and morphine on mid-latency auditory evoked potentials.
We have studied dose-dependent effects of alfentanil, fentanyl and morphine on mid-latency auditory evoked potentials (MLAEP). Anaesthesia was induced with alfentanil 100 micrograms kg-1 every 5 min to a total dose of 500 micrograms kg-1 (group I, n = 10), fentanyl 10 micrograms kg-1 every 7 min to a total dose of 50 micrograms kg-1 (group II, n = 10) or morphine 1 mg kg-1 for induction and 0.5 mg kg-1 every 15 min to a total dose of 3 mg kg-1 (group III, n = 10). MLAEP were recorded before and 3-15 min after every opioid dose on vertex (positive) and mastoids on both sides (negative). ⋯ There was a marked increase only in latency and decrease in amplitude of P1. In contrast, for the early cortical potentials Na and Pa, only small increases in latencies and decreases in amplitudes were observed. After the largest doses of alfentanil (500 micrograms kg-1), fentanyl (50 micrograms kg-1) and morphine (3 mg kg-1), Na, Pa and Nb showed a similar pattern as in awake patients.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Comparison of 0.125% bupivacaine with 0.125% bupivacaine and clonidine as extradural analgesia in the first stage of labour.
We have studied 42 healthy parturients with singleton vertex pregnancies, who were in the first stage of labour and requesting extradural analgesia. They were allocated randomly in a double-blind fashion to receive either 0.125% bupivacaine plain or 0.125% bupivacaine with clonidine 120 micrograms. Efficacy of analgesia was evaluated using linear visual analogue scoring (VAS), sensory block was assessed using bilateral pinprick in the mid-clavicular line and sedation scored on a five-point scale. ⋯ Maternal heart rate was less than baseline values at 30-90 min in the bupivacaine-clonidine group only. Sedation was greater in the bupivacaine-clonidine group, especially from 15 to 45 min (P < 0.01). There were no differences in fetal heart rate, mode of delivery or Apgar scores between the two groups.