British journal of anaesthesia
-
Review Meta Analysis
Measurement of quality of recovery after surgery using the 15-item quality of recovery scale: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
There are very few patient-centred global outcome measures of recovery in the days or weeks after surgery. This meta-analysis evaluated the psychometric properties and clinical acceptability of the 15-item quality of recovery (QoR-15) scale. ⋯ Open Science Framework Identifier: DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/78HTA.
-
High intraoperative PEEP with recruitment manoeuvres may improve perioperative outcomes. We re-examined this question by conducting a patient-level meta-analysis of three clinical trials in adult patients at increased risk for postoperative pulmonary complications who underwent non-cardiothoracic and non-neurological surgery. ⋯ NCT03937375 (Clinicaltrials.gov).
-
Perioperative hypotension is common and associated with poor outcomes, including acute kidney injury (AKI). The mechanistic link between perioperative hypotension and AKI is at least partly a consequence of the susceptibility of the kidney, and particularly the renal medulla, to ischaemia and hypoxia. Several critical gaps in our knowledge lead to uncertainty about when and how to intervene to prevent AKI attributable to perioperative hypotension. ⋯ Third, there is little information regarding the relative risks and benefits of various clinically available therapies (e.g. vasoconstrictors, i.v. fluids, or both) to treat and prevent perioperative hypotension, particularly with regard to renal medullary perfusion and oxygenation. Fourth, there are currently no validated, clinically feasible methods for real-time clinical monitoring of renal perfusion or oxygenation. Thus, future developments in perioperative kidney-protective strategies must rely on the development of methods to better monitor renal perfusion and oxygenation in the perioperative period, and thereby guide timing, intensity, type, and duration of interventions.
-
Perioperative hypotension has been repeatedly associated with organ injury and worse outcome, yet many interventions to reduce morbidity by attempting to avoid or reverse hypotension have floundered. In part, this reflects uncertainty as to what threshold of hypotension is relevant in the perioperative setting. Shifting population-based definitions for hypertension, plus uncertainty regarding individualised norms before surgery, both present major challenges in constructing useful clinical guidelines that may help improve clinical outcomes. ⋯ Consideration of the mosaic framework is critical for a more complete understanding of the perioperative response to acute sterile and infectious inflammation. The largely arbitrary treatment of perioperative blood pressure remains rudimentary in the context of multiple complex adaptive hypertensive endotypes, defined by distinct functional or pathobiological mechanisms, including the regulation of reactive oxygen species, autonomic dysfunction, and inflammation. Developing coherent strategies for the management of perioperative hypotension requires smarter, mechanistically solid interventions delivered by RCTs where observer bias is minimised.