Neuromodulation : journal of the International Neuromodulation Society
-
The failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS) is the most common chronic pain syndrome. Whereas it is relatively easy to achieve pain relief in the lower limbs of FBSS patients with spinal cord stimulation (SCS), it is difficult to manage low back pain with SCS. The performance of a paddle-shaped SCS lead that can be inserted surgically as well as percutaneously (a hybrid lead) was evaluated in a prospective study on the relief of low back pain and leg pain in patients with FBSS. ⋯ SCS with a hybrid lead in subjects with FBSS is safe, and causes significant pain relief in both the low back and the lower limbs.
-
We examined the efficacy of temporary spinal cord stimulation involving the insertion of only a needle and quadripolar lead into the epidural space and applied using an extracorporeal stimulation generator for a few weeks of early postherpetic neuralgia from one to six months of its onset. ⋯ Temporary spinal cord stimulation is an effective analgesic method for early postherpetic neuralgia from one to six months of its onset.
-
Complex regional pain syndrome type 1 (CRPS-1) has a 31% probability of becoming chronic. The early use of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) has been recommended as a strategy to prevent chronicity and functional impairment. ⋯ We conclude that the feasibility of performing a randomized controlled trial on early SCS therapy in CRPS-1 is low because of the good disease improvement with standard therapy in the first year after onset. This study raises questions about the need to use SCS early in the course of CRPS-1 because of the probable lack of additional benefit compared with SCS in chronic CRPS-1.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study
A comparison of the hypoalgesic effects of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) and non-invasive interactive neurostimulation (InterX(®)) on experimentally induced blunt pressure pain using healthy human volunteers.
Non-invasive interactive neurostimulation (InterX(®)) delivers high amplitude electrical pulsed currents at points of low impedance on the skin. This study compared the hypoalgesic effect of non-invasive interactive neurostimulation with transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS). ⋯ Given the limited power of this study, we show that there were no significant differences in hypoalgesia between non-invasive interactive neurostimulation and TENS. Unlike our previous studies we also failed to detect a change pain threshold during TENS. Nevertheless, our findings can be used to inform the design of an appropriately powered study on pain patients.