Journal of palliative medicine
-
Background: End-of-life dreams and visions (ELDVs) are a common phenomenon in which dying patients experience dreams/visions often of deceased loved ones before death. Past research has highlighted the need for education and awareness to improve clinical engagement at the bedside in response to ELDVs. Objectives: To explore the perspectives of multidisciplinary hospice care providers who are ELDV subject matter experts. ⋯ A secondary thematic analysis focused on defining/describing ELDVs and resulted in two themes: Natural Part of Dying and ELDV Properties. Conclusions: Findings identified facilitators and barriers encountered when caring for a patient with ELDVs. Based on this, an initial set of recommendations for meaningful clinical engagement regarding ELDVs and initial operationalized definition has been proposed.
-
Background: Palliative care literature indicates a dearth of programs addressing the psychosocial needs of adolescents and young adults (AYAs). Objectives: This study assessed patient-reported experiences of a palliative care peer support program, analyzed psychometric qualities of the program evaluation, and examined associations with quality-of-life scores to assess validity and potential impact on aspects of AYA quality of life. Design: This retrospective, cross-sectional study described self-reported Streetlight program evaluation and quality of life of AYA patients, exploratory factor analysis of survey responses, and analysis of associations with quality of life. ⋯ Analyses identified three factors explaining 61% of variance in Streetlight program evaluation responses: "Friendships and Support" (26%); "Coping, Family, and Providers" (20%); and "Diversion and Respect" (15%). Significant positive associations were found between Streetlight evaluation scores and YQOL-SF Belief in Self and Family factor scores, as well as between Streetlight evaluation Friendships and Support factor scores, and YQOL-SF total and factor-specific scores. Conclusions: Results suggest that the Streetlight program is a viable model to facilitate positive experiences, opportunities for socialization, and meaningful peer support for AYA patients.
-
Purpose: Primary palliative care (PPC) interventions are needed to address unmet symptom needs within standard oncology care. We designed an oncology nurse-led PPC intervention using shared care planning to facilitate patient engagement. This analysis examines the prevalence and severity of symptoms reported by patients and how symptoms were addressed on shared care plans (SCPs). ⋯ Conclusion: The symptoms that patients report most frequently and as most severe on SCPs were addressed less frequently than expected. Further research is needed to understand how PPC interventions can be designed to more effectively target and improve bothersome symptoms for patients with advanced cancer. Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02712229.
-
Context: A daily nine-item "Handbook for Self-Care at Work" was created to increase the well-being and satisfaction of the staff at the department of palliative care of a tertiary oncological center in the United States. Objectives: To evaluate the perceived usefulness of and adherence to the Handbook. Design, Setting and Participants: An anonymous survey was conducted among the palliative care staff asking for the frequency of utilization and the perception of usefulness of the Handbook. ⋯ During the COVID-19 pandemic, 32 (82%) respondents found the Handbook to be as/somewhat more/much more useful, and 29 (75%) were able to adhere to the items as/somewhat more/much more often than before. Conclusion: Most respondents found the Handbook useful and were able to accomplish the items most of the days. During the COVID-19 pandemic, the staff felt that the Handbook was more useful.
-
Background: The determination of what makes a medical treatment inappropriate is unclear with a small likelihood of consensus. Objectives: This study aimed to explore how clinicians in cardiology perceive "inappropriate treatment" and to collate the common profiles of cardiology patients receiving likely "inappropriate treatment" as perceived by clinicians in a multiethnic Asian context. Methods: A qualitative study was conducted using semistructured in-depth interviews with 32 clinicians involved in the care for cardiology patients at a large national cardiology center in Singapore. ⋯ Patient prognostic profiles, characterized as likely to have received inappropriate treatment by clinicians, were organized into six categories according to demographic, clinical, and functional factors. Conclusions: The perception of inappropriateness of treatments among clinicians in cardiology was primarily focused on patient-related outcomes. Collated patient profiles may serve as meaningful indicators of patient cases receiving potentially inappropriate treatment for further research and intervention.