Emergencias
-
Letter Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study
Effectiveness and safety of vernakalant vs flecainide for cardioversion of atrial fibrillation in the emergency department: the VERITA study.
-
Letter Randomized Controlled Trial
Interim analysis of phase-2 results from the SYMEVECA study on new modes of ventilation for patients during cardiopulmonary resuscitation.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial
Effect of a clinical pharmacist on 30-day revisits following discharge from an emergency department: a randomized controlled clinical trial.
To evaluate a clinical pharmacist's inclusion in emergency department (ED) care in terms of the effect on on 30-day revisits after discharge from the ED and patient satisfaction. ⋯ Including a clinical pharmacist in ED care substantially reduces the number of 30-day revisits and increases patient satisfaction.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial
Effects of midazolam vs morphine in patients with acute pulmonary edema with left ventricular systolic dysfunction: a secondary analysis of data from the MIMO trial.
The midazolam vs morphine (MIMO) trial showed that patients treated with midazolam had fewer serious adverse events than those treated with morphine. In many patients with acute pulmonary edema, the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is preserved, at 50% or higher. We aimed to determine whether left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction (D), defined by an LVEF of less than 50%, modifies the protective effect of midazolam vs morphine. ⋯ The effect of midazolam vs morphine in protecting against the development of serious adverse events or death is similar in patients with and without systolic LVD.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial
Efficacy of emergency medical center use of a protocol during telephone calls to give medical advice related to fever or gastroenteritis: a cluster randomized controlled trial.
To determine the efficacy of emergency medical center physicians' use of a protocol to guide their management of telephone consultations for fever and gastroenteritis. ⋯ Use of the protocol was associated with fewer unscheduled in-person visits for care and fewer hospital admissions. The protocol is safe and less costly than the centers' usual approaches to giving telephone advice.