Journal of pain & palliative care pharmacotherapy
-
J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother · Mar 2024
Multicenter Study Observational StudyA Multicenter Retrospective Observational Study Analyzing the Effect of Polypharmacy on Oxycodone Tolerability.
Polypharmacy is becoming increasingly troublesome in the treatment of cancer. The aim of this study was to explore the effects of concomitant polypharmacy comprising drugs that inhibit CYP3A4 and/or CYP2D6 on the oxycodone tolerability in patients with cancer. We conducted a multicenter retrospective study encompassing 20 hospitals. ⋯ Multivariate analysis showed that more than two concomitant CYP3A4 inhibitors and no concomitant use of naldemedine were independent risk factors for OINV. Concomitant polypharmacy involving CYP3A4 inhibitors increases the risk of OINV. Therefore, medications concomitantly used with oxycodone should be optimized.
-
J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother · Sep 2021
Multicenter StudyA Comparison of Two Regimens for Managing Sickle Cell Pain and Reducing Readmissions.
This was a multicenter retrospective analysis comparing intravenous push (IVP) analgesia versus patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) in patients admitted for sickle cell pain crisis. The primary objective was to compare the analgesic management, measured in total daily morphine milligram equivalents (MME). Secondary objectives included length of hospitalization, 30-day hospital readmissions and pain scores. ⋯ Length of hospitalization was not different between patients on IVP and PCA (7.14 vs. 6.39 days, p = 0.53). There was no difference in 30-day readmissions, average pain scores on days 1-3 of hospitalization and adverse side effects between the groups. This study showed patients on IVP had significantly lower total daily MME requirements compared to PCA within the first three calendar days of admission.
-
J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother · Jun 2020
Case Reports Multicenter StudyA Multi-Centered Case Series Highlighting the Clinical Use and Dosing of Lidocaine and Mexiletine for Refractory Cancer Pain.
Lidocaine infusion for pain control has been used for years. While some centers transition from continuous infusion lidocaine to oral mexiletine, there are no published studies to guide this conversion in pain and palliative care settings. This is a retrospective case series of 10 cancer patients across four institutions, with attention to dosing of both agents, and subsequent decrease in morphine-equivalent daily dosing (MEDD). ⋯ There was no lidocaine-induced toxicity and no lidocaine levels were obtained. Two of the 10 patients stopped mexiletine early, one from confusion four days after initiation of mexiletine, and the other after six weeks due to dizziness and visual changes. For cancer patients with suboptimal pain control on large doses of opioid, lidocaine infusion followed by oral mexiletine was well tolerated and effective.
-
J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother · Dec 2014
Multicenter Study Clinical TrialPharmacokinetics of oxycodone after intravenous and subcutaneous administration in Japanese patients with cancer pain.
ABSTRACT In Japan, Oxycodone hydrochloride injection formulation has been approved in 2012. However, its pharmacokinetics has been poorly studied. The aim of this study is to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of oxycodone after intravenous and subcutaneous administration of oxycodone hydrochloride injection in Japanese patients with cancer pain. ⋯ The estimated geometric mean clearance (CL) of oxycodone was 24.3 L per hour after constant intravenous infusion and 29.5 L per hour after constant subcutaneous infusion, respectively. Population pharmacokinetic analysis indicated that body surface area was the influencing factor on CL and there were no pharmacokinetic differences for CL between intravenous and subcutaneous infusion. These results provide important information for the clinical use of oxycodone injection.
-
J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother · Dec 2013
Multicenter StudyQuality of postoperative pain management in American versus European institutions.
Management of postoperative pain remains an important clinical problem throughout the world. Using the PAIN-OUT acute pain registry database to examine perioperative pain management in orthopedic surgery patients, we compared patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in a pooled sample obtained from four American hospitals (N = 473) with PROs in a pooled sample of 20 European institutions (N = 8799). Most American hospitals consistently assess acute pain in surgical patients due to Joint Commission accreditation guidelines. ⋯ Europeans also reported significantly less emotional discomfort, less interference of pain with activity and lower Least Pain. Nonetheless, 98.3% of American patients received opioids on the ward on the first postoperative day compared to 70.2% of European patients, and 41.1% received regional analgesia on the ward while 15.9% of European patients received regional analgesia (both small effect sizes). Overall, the results are clear in demonstrating much better pain control in the ensemble of European countries as compared to the United States.