Articles: analgesia.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
Intrathecal sufentanil for labor analgesia. Effects of added epinephrine.
Intrathecal sufentanil has been found to provide profound analgesia during labor. Epinephrine, when added to various local anesthetic agents or opioids, may modify the analgesic profile and incidence of side effects. The authors sought to determine the effect of adding 0.2 mg epinephrine to 10 micrograms sufentanil when administered for analgesia during labor. ⋯ Intrathecal sufentanil 10 micrograms, both with and without epinephrine, provided rapid-onset, albeit short-duration, analgesia during labor. Epinephrine did not prolong the duration of intrathecal sufentanil analgesia. The addition of epinephrine increased the incidence of nausea and decreased the incidence and severity of pruritus.
-
Comparative Study Clinical Trial Controlled Clinical Trial
Patient-controlled extradural analgesia to compare bupivacaine, fentanyl and bupivacaine with fentanyl in the treatment of postoperative pain.
We have assessed the effect of combining extradural bupivacaine and fentanyl in 60 orthopaedic patients who received 0.125% bupivacaine (bupivacaine group), fentanyl 5 micrograms ml-1 (fentanyl group), or 0.125% bupivacaine combined with fentanyl 5 micrograms ml-1 (combined group), delivered by patient-controlled extradural analgesia for 24 h via a lumbar extradural catheter. Adding bupivacaine to fentanyl reduced mean (SD) fentanyl administration from 117 (46) ml to 89 (42) ml (P < 0.005). Adding fentanyl to bupivacaine reduced mean bupivacaine administration from 113 (46) ml to 89 (42) ml (P < 0.05). ⋯ The mean pain score was greater also for knee replacement (16 (10) mm) than for hip replacement (10 (9) mm) (P < 0.05). We conclude that extradural bupivacaine and fentanyl were additive in their analgesic actions, resulting in decreased requirements of each individual agent. Knee replacement was found also to be more painful than hip replacement after operation.
-
Meta Analysis
Postoperative patient-controlled analgesia: meta-analyses of initial randomized control trials.
To compare outcomes during conventional analgesia (as-needed intramuscular dosing) and patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) in postoperative patients by analyzing data from published comparative trials. ⋯ Patient preference strongly favors PCA over conventional analgesia. Patients using PCA also obtain better pain relief than those using conventional analgesia, without an increase in side effects. Favorable effect of PCA upon analgesic usage and length of hospital stay did not in the initial trials attain statistical significance. Nonetheless, the favorable trends in the mean effect sizes for both outcomes argue that further studies of both outcomes should be performed to determine whether the favorable impact of PCA upon either may become statistically significant if larger numbers of patients are enrolled.
-
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand · May 1993
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial Controlled Clinical TrialCaudal buprenorphine for postoperative analgesia in children: a comparison with intramuscular buprenorphine.
This study was conducted on 44 children aged 1-10 years, who had undergone lower extremity orthopaedic surgery under general anaesthesia. Patients were divided into two groups: Group 1 (n = 23) received buprenorphine caudally and Group 2 (n = 21) received buprenorphine intramuscularly, at the completion of the surgery. The dose of buprenorphine used in both the groups was 4 micrograms.kg-1 body weight. ⋯ The duration of analgesia was significantly greater with caudal buprenorphine (median 20.20 h) than with intramuscular buprenorphine (median 5.20 h). Of the patients in the caudal group, 43% did not require any supplemental analgesia during the first 24 h, whereas all the patients in the intramuscular group required supplements within 10 h postoperatively. Caudal buprenorphine (4 micrograms.kg-1 body weight) provided 10.8 h to more than 24 h of analgesia in children, with fewer side effects.
-
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand · May 1993
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialComparison of epidural methadone with epidural diamorphine for analgesia following caesarean section.
Analgesia provided by either 5 mg diamorphine, or 5 mg methadone administered by the epidural route during elective caesarean section was compared in 40 women. The median time to further analgesia in the methadone group was 395 min, and 720 min in the diamorphine group, P = 0.0003. Linear analogue scores to assess pain were measured 2-hourly for 12 h, then again at 24 h postoperatively. ⋯ Continuous pulse oximetry data were available for 12 h post-operatively in 15 patients receiving methadone, and in 17 patients receiving diamorphine. One or more episodes of significant desaturation (< 90% for 30 s), occurred in three patients receiving methadone, and in nine patients receiving diamorphine. Desaturation to 90-92% occurred in a further three patients given epidural diamorphine, and in one further patient given epidural methadone.