Articles: back-pain.
-
Das Gesundheitswesen · Dec 2009
Review Meta Analysis[Unspecific back pain - basic principles and possibilities for intervention from a psychological point of view].
Back pain is one of the most common and expensive health problems in Germany. Apart from somatic parameters, psychological factors are thought to influence the aetiology and, especially, the chronification of back pain. A literature search has been performed to establish which psychological procedures are used in the diagnosis, prevention and therapy for back pain, and how effective they are. ⋯ In the high risk group of patients already suffering from back pain, relapses and chronification can best be prevented by multimodal programmes. A decisive condition for the success of these physiotherapeutic, ergotherapeutic, sports therapeutic and psychotherapeutic interventions is apparently that there should be a standardised procedure in accordance with the theoretical principles of behavioural therapy, complied with by all those involved in the process. However, the principle objective of all measures should be the avoidance of the transition from acute to chronic back pain and the protracted and expensive clinical course this can lead to. Psychological intervention appears to work here as well. Further studies are needed to clarify whether the psychological program components are effective in isolation or whether they must be embedded in a multimodal (preventive) concept. It must also be investigated which target groups benefit most from which type of preventive (psychological) intervention. Provision of specific information is an alternative preventive approach. This health psychological or educative procedure corresponds to demedicalisation of this condition. Although media campaigns have been successfully performed in Australia, it is as yet unclear whether these can be transferred to Germany and which structural changes these would require in our health care system.
-
Review Meta Analysis
Recurrent disc herniation and long-term back pain after primary lumbar discectomy: review of outcomes reported for limited versus aggressive disc removal.
It remains unknown whether aggressive disc removal with curettage or limited removal of disc fragment alone with little disc invasion provides a better outcome for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation with radiculopathy. We reviewed the literature to determine whether outcomes reported after limited discectomy (LD) differed from those reported after aggressive discectomy (AD) with regard to long-term back pain or recurrent disc herniation. ⋯ Review of the literature demonstrates a greater reported incidence of long-term recurrent back and leg pain after AD but a greater reported incidence of recurrent disc herniation after LD. Prospective, randomized trials are needed to firmly assess this possible difference.
-
Review Meta Analysis
Meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of intradiscal electrothermal therapy (IDET).
The objective of this study was to determine the representative outcomes of the intradiscal electrothermal therapy (IDET) procedure in terms of pain relief, reduction of disability, and risk of complications. ⋯ Although variation exists in the reported outcomes among the various studies of the IDET procedure, the pooled results of the published studies provide compelling evidence of the relative efficacy and safety of the IDET procedure.
-
J Pain Symptom Manage · Apr 2006
Review Meta AnalysisSpinal cord stimulation in complex regional pain syndrome and refractory neuropathic back and leg pain/failed back surgery syndrome: results of a systematic review and meta-analysis.
The drive for good quality evidence has highlighted the importance of well-conducted systematic reviews and meta-analyses that critically evaluate and grade studies for new or existing therapies. A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to review the efficacy, safety, and cost effectiveness of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) in complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) and refractory neuropathic back and leg pain/failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS). The results support the use of SCS in patients with refractory neuropathic back and leg pain/FBSS (Grade B evidence) and CRPS type I (Grade A evidence)/type II (Grade D evidence). SCS not only reduces pain, improves quality of life, reduces analgesic consumption, and allows some patients to return to work, with minimal significant adverse events, but may also result in significant cost savings over time.
-
Review Meta Analysis
School-based interventions for spinal pain: a systematic review.
Systematic review. ⋯ The poor quality of the reviewed studies limits the conclusions that can be made regarding the effectiveness of school-based spinal health interventions.