Articles: general-anesthesia.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Postoperative apnea in former preterm infants: prospective comparison of spinal and general anesthesia.
Thirty-six former preterm infants undergoing inguinal hernia repair were studied. All were less than or equal to 51 weeks postconceptual age at the time of operation. Patients were randomly assigned to receive general or spinal anesthesia. ⋯ Two of these five infants had no prior history of apnea. When infants with no prior history of apnea were analyzed separately, there was no statistically significant increased incidence of apnea in children receiving general versus spinal anesthesia with or without ketamine sedation. Because of the small numbers of patients studied, and the multiple factors that may influence the incidence of postoperative apnea (e.g., prior history of neonatal apnea), standard postoperative respiratory monitoring of these high-risk infants is still recommended following all anesthetic techniques.
-
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand · Apr 1990
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial Controlled Clinical TrialThe experience of the person ventilating the lungs does influence postoperative nausea and vomiting.
One hundred and ninety-eight patients undergoing elective abdominal hysterectomy were anaesthetized with isoflurane in nitrous oxide and oxygen. Ventilation before endotracheal intubation was carried out either by an experienced senior or by an inexperienced junior member of the anaesthetic team. ⋯ Patients whose lungs had been ventilated by experienced members of staff had significantly less (P less than 0.05 to 0.01) postoperative emesis in the recovery room (incidence of emesis 35%) and 2-6 h after operation (incidence 27%) when compared to patients whose lungs had been ventilated by inexperienced members of staff (incidence of emesis 54% and 40% in the recovery room and after 2 to 6 h, respectively). The results suggest that the experience of the person ventilating the lungs is associated with postoperative nausea and vomiting.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Comparative evaluation of propofol and thiopentone for total intravenous anaesthesia.
Sixty unpremedicated ASA physical status I or II patients scheduled for surgical procedures of intermediate duration (15 to 60 min) were studied to evaluate the safety and efficacy of propofol, to measure recovery times and to compare the return of psychomotor and cognitive function with thiopentone. Patients were randomly allocated into two groups. Anaesthesia was induced and maintained by either propofol (2.0-2.5 mg.kg-1 followed by a continuous infusion 0.1-0.2 mg.kg-1.min-1) or thiopentone (4.0-5.0 mg.kg-1, and infusion rate 0.16-0.32 mg.kg-1.min-1), titrated to patient response. ⋯ Psychomotor and cognitive function returned earlier with propofol and fewer side effects were noted. At 24 hr there was no distinguishable difference between groups. Propofol is a safe anaesthetic agent with the potential for early patient discharge and street fitness after outpatient procedures.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Spinal anaesthesia in young patients using a 29-gauge needle: technical considerations and an evaluation of postoperative complaints compared with general anaesthesia.
One hundred patients aged 18-49 yr, undergoing elective arthroscopy of the knee joint, were allocated randomly to either spinal anaesthesia using a 29-gauge spinal needle or general anaesthesia. Dural puncture was considered difficult in 18% of the patients receiving spinal anaesthesia. In three patients (6%) it was necessary to supplement the spinal anaesthetic with general anaesthesia. ⋯ This headache was of short duration and disappeared without treatment. Spinal anaesthesia caused more backache than general anaesthesia, otherwise the frequency of postoperative complaints was the same or lower. Ninety-six percent of the patients receiving spinal anaesthesia would prefer the same anaesthetic for a similar procedure in the future.
-
Anasth Intensivther Notfallmed · Feb 1990
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial[Total intravenous anesthesia using propofol and alfentanil in comparison with balanced anesthesia in neurosurgery].
Anaesthesia for neurosurgical patients should provide haemodynamic stability, reduce cerebral metabolism, preserve cerebral autoregulation, avoid increases of intracranial pressure and guarantee rapid recovery without respiratory depression. A commonly used Balanced Anaesthesia (BA, n = 20) (thiopental and fentanyl bolus induction and maintenance with repetition boluses of fentanyl and droperidol, thiopental infusion, and isoflurane in N2O/O2) was compared to Total Intravenous Anaesthesia (TIVA, n = 20) with propofol and alfentanil infusion. Pancuronium was employed for muscle relaxation in both groups. ⋯ Quality of recovery after the procedure was determined by standardised psychometric tests. The time span between awakening of patients to orientation and concentration was significantly shorter in the TIVA group compared to the BA group. There was also a smaller deviation of these parameters in the TIVA group indicating a more predictable recovery.