Articles: pain-measurement.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
Characterisation of capsaicin-induced mechanical hyperalgesia as a marker for altered nociceptive processing in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.
Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is characterised by pain and tenderness not only over inflamed or damaged joints, but also over apparently normal tissues. Experimental models suggest that these features results from changes of sensitivity within both peripheral and central neurones, but direct evidence from human disease is lacking. At present, most clinical studies have evaluated overall pain experience rather than activity within components of the nociceptive pathway. ⋯ Peripheral sensory activity over the forearms of rheumatoid patients has previously been shown to be normal and the results suggest the presence of enhanced central mechanisms in this disorder. The correlation between capsaicin-induced hyperalgesia and joint tenderness in the RA patients implies that joint symptoms arise partially as a result of central, and not exclusively peripheral, factors. The study supports the use of capsaicin-based techniques to explore nociceptive mechanisms in clinical disorders characterised by chronic pain.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
The effects of medical evidence and pain intensity on medical student judgments of chronic pain patients.
This study examined symptom judgments made by medical students of hypothetical chronic low back pain patients. Eight vignettes were varied as to the pain intensity reported by the hypothetical patient (low vs. moderate vs. high vs. very high) and the availability of medical evidence supportive of the pain report (present vs. absent). Ninety-five subjects read vignettes and made judgments of patient emotional distress, pain intensity, and pain-related disability. ⋯ Judgments of pain and disability were higher for patients for whom medical evidence was present compared to those for whom it was absent. The results support and extend previous research on the effects of situational and patient variables on observer pain judgments. Future research should examine the influence of these biasing variables on the assessment and treatment of chronic pain patients.
-
The Journal of urology · Jan 1997
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialRandomized, prospective, double-blind study of the effects on pain perception of lidocaine jelly versus plain lubricant during outpatient rigid cystoscopy.
There is no clear evidence that intraurethral lidocaine jelly decreases pain and/or makes rigid cystoscopy more tolerable for patients. Since lidocaine jelly is significantly more expensive than plain lubricant, we attempted to assess the true benefit of this agent. ⋯ Lidocaine jelly offers no advantage over plain lubricant in regard to pain control during rigid cystoscopy in women. However, when used in adequate amounts and allowed to dwell in the urethra for 20 minutes before cystoscopy, lidocaine jelly can significantly decrease pain in men.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
Postoperative use of pediatric pain scales: children's self-report versus nurse assessment of pain intensity and affect.
The purpose was to examine nurses' use of pediatric pain scales and to compare their estimate of the child's pain intensity and affect with the child's self-report. The Analog Chromatic Continuous Scale (ACCS) was used for pain intensity and the McGrath Affective Faces Scale (MAFS) for pain affect. Self-report of pain was obtained from 124 hospitalized postoperative children aged 5 to 17 years and compared with estimates of 44 pediatric nurses randomly assigned to either an experimental or control group. ⋯ Findings revealed that only 36% of the nurses had at any time used a pediatric pain scale. Correlations between the experimental nurses' ratings and the child's self-report were significantly higher than the control nurses' estimates and the child's self-report. The correlation between the child's self-report of pain intensity on the ACCS and of affect on the MAFS was r = .612, suggesting that nurses' use of both an intensity and affect pediatric pain scale would more accurately reflect the child's pain experience.
-
Regional anesthesia · Nov 1996
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialEMLA cream effectively reduces the pain of spinal needle insertion.
EMLA cream is an effective topical anesthetic, which is commonly used for analgesia during venous cannulation in the pediatric population. This study was designed to compare the efficacy of EMLA cream with that of infiltration with lidocaine in relieving the pain associated with administration of spinal anesthesia. ⋯ EMLA cream is an effective alternative to lidocaine infiltration for analgesia during the administration of spinal anesthesia when using a 25-gauge spinal needle via a 20-gauge introducer. Application of EMLA cream for at least 30 minutes prior to spinal needle insertion is adequate to provide good analgesia during needle insertion.