Articles: pain-measurement.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial Controlled Clinical Trial
Analgesic effects of different pulse patterns of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation on cold-induced pain in normal subjects.
The analgesic efficacy of various pulse patterns of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) were assessed in 84 normal healthy subjects using the cold pressor pain technique. Burst, modulation, random and continuous TENS all significantly elevated ice pain threshold. ⋯ Increasing the size of electrodes reduced the effect of continuous TENS. The clinical implications of these findings are discussed.
-
Ann Fr Anesth Reanim · Jan 1991
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial[Evaluation of obstetrical pain by a questionnaire of adjectives. Comparison of 2 epidural analgesia protocols].
A French version of the McGill pain questionnaire, the "Questionnaire Douleur Saint Antoine" (QDSA), was assessed prospectively by comparing two epidural analgesia protocols using bupivacaine. One hundred women in labour who asked for epidural analgesia were randomly allocated to two groups and received either 0.25% or 0.5% bupivacaine (mean initial doses 32.5 and 50 mg respectively) with adrenaline 1 in 200,000. All the patients were then instructed to trigger a patient controlled analgesia (PCA) device for top-up doses of 0.25% bupivacaine with adrenaline 1 in 400,000 once they became aware of pain returning. ⋯ On the other hand, the affective part of the score was only correlated with the level of anxiety and behaviour. The sensory part of this score was the only one to show a difference between the different initial doses given to the patients. The results obtained with this series of patients underline the value of a multidimensional assessment of labour pain.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
[Initial results of the reliability and validity of a German-language scale for the quantitative measurement of postoperative pain in young children].
In a previous study it was proved impossible to evaluate the validity of a system modified according to McGrath et al. for measuring postoperative pain in children. Three reasons were postulated for this result. The analgesics used did not modulate the pain in such a manner that the statistical analysis was effective; or the postoperative pain had an acute onset or fluctuated and the regular observations did not allow detection of the pain peaks; or the system used did not measure pain. ⋯ RESULTS. A replication verified the results of the previous study: the factor analysis resulted in a one-factorial solution. Of the 8 items (wakefulness, wake-up reactions, crying, position of the trunk, position of the legs, verbal communications on being asked about pain, special defense against stimuli) only 4 had a sufficiently substantial load on all measurements (crying, facial expression, position of the trunk and position of the legs). (ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Lack of effect of clonidine and pentoxifylline in short-term therapy of diabetic peripheral neuropathy.
The goal of this study was to confirm or rule out anecdotal reports of beneficial effects of clonidine and pentoxifylline in the treatment of painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy. Clonidine was administered to 16 subjects at two dosage levels (0.1 and 0.2 mg/day) and was compared to placebo in a crossover design, with each phase lasting 4 wk. ⋯ There was a significant decrease in pain score from baseline with both active drugs (P less than 0.05), but this was no better than the response to placebo (P less than 0.30 for clonidine and P less than 0.95 for pentoxifylline). This study does not demonstrate a short-term benefit of either clonidine or pentoxifylline in the treatment of peripheral neuropathy.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
[Critical aspects of an outside evaluation of postoperative pain in infants. A placebo-controlled double-blind study of the question of the reliability and validity of the measurement system].
Postoperative analgesia in infants and young children is a topic of growing interest in pediatric anesthesia. Two systems measuring postoperative pain in this group of patients have been offered recently: CHEOPS (Childrens Hospital of Eastern Ontario Pain Scale) by McGrath et al. and OPS (Objective Pain Scale) by Hannallah et al. and Broadman et al. [3, 7, 8]. Both systems are economical and not reactive, but their validity is not satisfying. ⋯ The design of the study was accepted by the ethic committee with the provision that neither a sedative nor an analgesic drug should be withheld from any child if indicated. Therefore, all children who seemed to feel discomfort according to the subjective impression of the anesthetist received midazolam intraveneously to a maximal dose of 2 mg. All the behavioral data were included in a factor analysis (principal components)...