Articles: propofol.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
Alfentanil used to supplement propofol infusions for oesophagoscopy and bronchoscopy.
This randomised double-blinded study compared the cardiovascular stability and rate of recovery when propofol infusions with or without alfentanil were used to provide anaesthesia for rigid oesophagoscopy and (or) bronchoscopy. Forty-six patients were allocated randomly to receive either alfentanil 10 micrograms/kg or saline just before a rapid sequence induction with propofol. Suxamethonium 1 mg/kg was given and infusions of suxamethonium 10 mg/minute and propofol (10 mg/kg/hour for 10 minutes, 8 mg/kg/hour for 10 minutes and then 6 mg/kg/hour thereafter) were started. ⋯ Recovery from anaesthesia was assessed using the critical flicker fusion threshold. No differences were found between the groups and patients in both groups had returned to baseline values by 60 minutes. No patient had any recall of intra-operative events, and there were no other adverse effects of any significance.
-
Experimental evidence from various neuropsychological and neurophysiological fields indicates that an oscillatory brain mechanism in a frequency range of 30-40 Hz is necessary for adequate sensory information processing. An oscillatory component of that particular frequency range can also be observed in the mid-latency auditory evoked potentials. Thus general anesthesia can be defined as a suppression of sensory information processing, and the effect of the i.v. anesthetics, Propofol and ketamine, on auditory perception and auditory-evoked potentials was therefore studied. ⋯ In contrast to Propofol, ketamine does not alter auditory perception. Suppression of sensory information processing must take place at a higher cortical level in a dissociative manner. The persistence of a 30-40 Hz oscillation must be seen in connection with dreams and hallucinations as reported for the drug and may be interpreted as insufficient suppression of sensory information processing under ketamine anesthesia.
-
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand · Nov 1989
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial Controlled Clinical TrialInduction and recovery characteristics of propofol, thiopental and etomidate.
Propofol, thiopental and etomidate, with 20 patients in each group, were compared for anesthesia of short duration in women undergoing termination of pregnancy, with respect to: 1: pain on injection (equally often after propofol and etomidate, but more rarely after thiopental); 2: apnea following induction (no difference); 3: involuntary muscular movements more frequent after etomidate); 4: blood pressure (larger drop after propofol); 5: heart rate (greater increase after thiopental); 6: time to eye opening on command (longer after propofol); 7: Steward score on eye opening (no difference); 8: coin counting after 15, 30 and 60 min (performance better after propofol at 15 and 30 min, producing even shorter times than preoperatively at 60 min); 9: reaction time after 15, 30 and 60 min (performance better after propofol, producing even shorter times than preoperatively at 60 min. It is concluded that the faster recovery gives propofol an advantage over thiopental and etomidate in outpatient anesthesia.
-
J. Pharm. Pharmacol. · Nov 1989
Vascular effects of propofol: smooth muscle relaxation in isolated veins and arteries.
Isolated hepatic portal veins and aorta taken from the rat were used to investigate the direct action of the intravenous anaesthetic propofol. This compound is known to produce a fall in blood pressure in man and animals and it has been suggested that the hypotension may result from a direct vasodilator action on the veins and arterioles. ⋯ However, the concentrations required to produce this effect in the experiments on veins were significantly lower than those required to produce similar changes in the isolated artery preparation. We conclude that this direct action may contribute towards the hypotensive effects of propofol.