Articles: nerve-block.
-
Ann R Coll Surg Engl · Mar 1992
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialA comparison of bupivacaine instillation and inguinal field block for control of pain after herniorrhaphy.
In a single-blind, randomised trial, 50 consecutive adult patients for inguinal herniorrhaphy under general anaesthesia received either an inguinal field block or bupivacaine instilled into the wound to provide postoperative analgesia. Bupivacaine instillation was found to be simple, safe and effective. The method is particularly appropriate for day-case surgery.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
A comparison of two approaches to sciatic nerve block.
This study compared the posterior and popliteal fossa approaches for sciatic nerve block. Patients scheduled to undergo foot surgery were allocated randomly into one of two groups: group A (n = 20) received sciatic nerve block via the posterior approach and group B (n = 20) received a block using the popliteal fossa approach. All blocks were performed with the aid of a peripheral nerve stimulator and alkalinised 0.5% bupivacaine with 1 in 200,000 adrenaline was injected in a dose of 2 mg.kg-1. ⋯ There was no significant difference between the groups in respect of time to onset or duration of block. Patients in group B reported less discomfort during performance of the sciatic nerve block but required supplementary nerve blocks more frequently. We recommend the use of the posterior approach for sciatic nerve block.
-
The physiological basis of neurostimulation is recalled and its use for the placement of needles for neural blockade described. After an account of available equipment, the author gives his reasons for preferring some of it. ⋯ The indication for the use of neurostimulation in the practice of infiltration anaesthesia are enumerated and its advantages stressed. Finally its limitations and complications are presented.
-
Anesth Pain Control Dent · Jan 1992
Comparative StudyIntraoral conduction anesthesia with epinephrine-containing local anesthetics and arterial epinephrine plasma concentration.
Following conduction anesthesia using either lidocaine 2% with epinephrine 1:80,000, articaine 4% with epinephrine 1:100,000, or articaine 4% with epinephrine 1:200,000, the arterial plasma epinephrine concentration was measured. Eighteen healthy young patients scheduled for osteotomy of a mandibular third molar were studied. Each local anesthetic-epinephrine combination was tested in six patients. ⋯ The result was explained by the concentration difference in the local anesthetics. Although the vasodilating action of lidocaine and articaine is almost identical, there will be enhanced vasodilation by the doubled concentration in the case of articaine (4%) and the local resorption of epinephrine may be facilitated. There were no significant changes in the measured cardiovascular parameters.