Articles: nerve-block
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study
A randomised controlled trial of shoulder block vs. interscalene brachial plexus block for ventilatory function after shoulder arthroscopy.
The shoulder block may impair ventilatory function and diaphragmatic movement less than the interscalene brachial plexus block. We randomly allocated 30 adults who underwent shoulder arthroscopy under general anaesthesia to ultrasound-guided shoulder block or interscalene block with 20 ml bupivacaine 0.5%. ⋯ The mean (SD) numeric rating scale pain scores at rest after shoulder block were higher than after interscalene block at two postoperative hours, 1.4 (1.2) vs. 0.3 (0.7), p = 0.02, but lower at 24 postoperative hours, 1.3 (1.3) vs. 3.4 (2.3), p = 0.008. Mean (SD) pain scores on movement in the shoulder and interscalene blocks were similar, with respective values of 1.9 (1.9) vs. 0.7 (1.2), p = 0.13 at two postoperative hours and 3.7 (2.3) vs. 5.3 (2.5), p = 0.41, at 24 postoperative hours.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study
Hemidiaphragmatic paralysis following ultrasound-guided anterior vs. posterior suprascapular nerve block: a double-blind, randomised control trial.
Interscalene brachial plexus block provides analgesia for shoulder surgery but is associated with hemidiaphragmatic paralysis. Before considering a combined suprascapular and axillary nerve block as an alternative to interscalene brachial plexus block, evaluation of the incidence of diaphragmatic dysfunction according to the approach to the suprascapular nerve is necessary. We randomly allocated 84 patients undergoing arthroscopic shoulder surgery to an anterior or a posterior approach to the suprascapular nerve block combined with an axillary nerve block using 10 ml ropivacaine 0.375% for each nerve. ⋯ The median (interquartile range [range]) oral morphine equivalent consumption was significantly higher in the posterior approach when compared with the anterior approach, whether in the recovery area (20 [5-31 (0-60)] mg vs. 7.5 [0-14 (0-52)] mg, respectively; p = 0.004) or during the first 24 h (82 [61-127 (12-360) mg] vs. 58 [30-86 (0-160)] mg, respectively; p = 0.01). Patient satisfaction was comparable between groups (p = 0.6). Compared with the anterior approach, diaphragmatic function is best preserved with the posterior needle approach to the suprascapular nerve block.
-
The effect of local anaesthetic concentration on peripheral nerve block duration is unclear. Recent clinical trials found nerve blocks of equivalent duration despite changing local anaesthetic concentration but with a fixed local anaesthetic dose. A criticism of these studies is that the local anaesthetic doses used were above the proposed local anaesthetic dose-duration ceiling level, masking any potential effect of different local anaesthetic concentrations on nerve block duration. ⋯ In contrast to our hypothesis, we found no changes in mean sensory nerve block duration. However, local anaesthetic dilution resulted in reduced motor block duration.
-
The knee is innervated by the femoral, obturator, and sciatic nerves. An infrainguinal fascia iliaca compartment block (FICB) is often used as a technique for pain management after hip and knee arthroplasty. This approach blocks the femoral nerve, lateral femoral cutaneous nerve, and obturator nerve. Previous studies show suprainguinal FICB achieves improved postoperative analgesia compared with infrainguinal FICB after hip fracture. However, the analgesic effects of suprainguinal or infrainguinal FICB on the obturator nerve after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remain to be established. This study compared the efficacy of suprainguinal versus infrainguinal FICB for the blockade of the obturator nerve using electromyography and quantification of total opioid consumption during the 24 hours after TKA. ⋯ Suprainguinal FICB significantly increased the incidence of successful obturator nerve block and significantly decreased fentanyl consumption 24 hours after TKA compared with infrainguinal FICB.
-
The basic perineural catheter design has changed minimally since inception, with the catheter introduced through or over a straight needle. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration recently cleared a novel perineural catheter design comprising a catheter attached to the back of a suture-shaped needle that is inserted, advanced along the arc of its curvature pulling the catheter past the target nerve, and then exited through the skin in a second location. The authors hypothesized that analgesia would be noninferior using the new versus traditional catheter design in the first two days after painful foot/ankle surgery with a primary outcome of average pain measured with the Numeric Rating Scale. ⋯ Suture-type perineural catheters provided noninferior analgesia compared with traditional catheters for continuous popliteal-sciatic blocks after painful foot and ankle surgery. The new catheter design appears to be a viable alternative to traditional designs used for the past seven decades.