Articles: nerve-block.
-
Regional anesthesia · Jul 1990
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialLidocaine hydrocarbonate is not superior to lidocaine hydrochloride in interscalene brachial plexus block.
To determine the effect of carbonation of lidocaine, a comparison of 1.0% lidocaine hydrochloride (HCl) and 1.1% lidocaine hydrocarbonate (CO2), both with 1:200,000 epinephrine, was made in this study of 50 patients receiving interscalene brachial plexus blocks. Sensory block was determined by the response to pinprick in the C2-T2 dermatomes, while motor block was assessed by the development of paresis and paralysis at the shoulder and hand. The percentage of patients developing analgesia (decreased sensation to pinprick) and anesthesia (total absence of sensation to pinprick) at each dermatome level as well as the percentage of patients developing motor block was not significantly different between the two forms of lidocaine. ⋯ At the individual dermatomes, there was no difference in the onset of analgesia except at one dermatome level, C7, which was near the level of local anesthetic injection. Anesthesia onset in each dermatome as well as the onset of motor block did not differ between the two groups. It is concluded that lidocaine CO2 does not offer any significant clinical advantage over lidocaine HCl in interscalene brachial plexus block.
-
Regional-Anaesthesie · Jul 1990
Comparative Study[Axillary blockade of the brachial plexus using 60 ml prilocaine 0.5% vs. 40 ml prilocaine 1%. A clinical study of 144 patients carried out by the determination of the prilocaine concentration in the central venous blood and by the measurement of the subfascial pressure in the plexus following the injection].
We estimated in this study the efficacy of axillary plexus blockade with 60 ml prilocaine 0.5% (300 mg). Following electrostimulation of the median, radial or ulnar nerve (depending on the area of the hand to be operated on), we injected prilocaine in two groups of patients (large volume group, 60 ml prilocaine 0.5% in 20 s; n = 114 patients; normal volume group, 40 ml prilocaine 1% in 20 s; n = 30 patients). Anesthesia of the median and ulnar nerves was virtually complete in all patients, but anesthesia of the radial and musculocutaneous nerves was complete in only 67% (radial) and 75% (musculocutaneous) in the group with normal injection volume. ⋯ Estimation of the prilocaine concentration in the central venous blood 120 min after injection did not reveal different plasma concentrations in the two groups. The plasma concentrations were far below toxic levels. Only the time of plasma peak was earlier in the group with the larger volume, which was attributed to the larger area of diffusion of the vascular system in the plexus space.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
-
Comparative Study
Clinical evaluation of double-burst stimulation. Its relationship to train-of-four stimulation.
Double-burst stimulation was compared with train-of-four stimulation in 23 adult patients receiving atracurium. Train-of-four was interrupted in 11 subjects every 2 minutes by one double-burst stimulation, and re-applied 6-30 seconds later; the height of the first double-burst response, compared with its control, was depressed slightly more than T1. The relationship between double-burst stimulation ratio and train-of-four ratio was indistinguishable from the line of identity. ⋯ Fifteen anaesthetists were asked to detect fade manually in the second part of the study, while train-of-four was recorded on the opposite arm. One hundred and fourteen determinations were made in 12 patients. Fade was detected manually more often with double-burst stimulation than with TOF.
-
Regional-Anaesthesie · Jul 1990
[An accidental motor blockade of the femoral nerve following a blockade of the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve].
One hundred fifty successful blockades of the lateral cutaneous nerve of the thigh according to the technique of Eriksson with 7-10 ml prilocaine 1% or bupivacaine 0.25% for meralgia paresthetica resulted unexpectedly in 4 cases of complete and 5 cases of partial motor block of the femoral nerve. The fully reversible paralysis or paresis of parts of the lower limb following blockade of the lateral cutaneous nerve of the thigh is explained as a partial 3-in-1 block.
-
The three main nerves from the lumbar plexus may be blocked by injection of local anesthetic into the facial envelope of the femoral nerve ("three-in-one block"). The femoral nerve may be localized by obtaining paresthesia, by employing a nerve stimulator or by the loss of resistance technique. ⋯ The "three-in-one block" may be employed for immediately pain relief of pain and for treatment of postoperative pain from fractures in the hip, femur and knee. Introduction of a catheter into the femoral nerve sheath is recommended to provide continuous block of the lumbar plexus for relief of postoperative pain.