Articles: nerve-block.
-
Comparative Study Observational Study
A comparison of the postoperative analgesic effectiveness of low dose caudal epidural block and US-guided dorsal penile nerve block with in-plane technique in circumcision.
Circumcision can be performed under sedo-analgesia, general anesthesia, or regional anesthesia. It may cause serious postoperative pain and patients often require additional analgesia. Dorsal penile nerve block (DPNB) and caudal epidural block are commonly used regional anesthesia methods to provide effective postoperative pain control in circumcision. ⋯ DPNB conducted with the US-guided in-plane technique is a simple and safe regional anesthesia method used to provide effective postoperative analgesia for male circumcision. Complications related to DPNB can be prevented with the help of the real-time imaging provided by ultrasound.
-
Comparative Study Observational Study
＜Editors' Choice＞ Efficacy of pectoral nerve block type-2 (Pecs II block) versus serratus plane block for postoperative analgesia in breast cancer surgery: a retrospective study.
Thoracic wall nerve blocks reduce postoperative acute pain after breast cancer surgery (BCS); however, their short-term effects and the most effective technique remain unclear. To compare the effects of pectoral nerve block type-2 (Pecs II block) and serratus plane block for postoperative short-term analgesia, we retrospectively reviewed 43 BCS patients who underwent Pecs II block (n=22) or serratus plane block (n=21). The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with no complaints of pain 2 months post-BCS. ⋯ Regarding post-BCS acute analgesia, the median [interquartile range] postoperative 24-hour pain score was 2 [1-3] and 3 [1.5-3.5], and the median morphine consumption within 24 hours was 1.5 [0.75-5.5] and 3 [1.5-10] mg in Pecs II block and serratus plane block (P=0.47 and P=0.11), respectively. This study suggests that Pecs II block prevents short-term post-BCS pain better than serratus plane block. However, further studies are needed in order to support this finding.
-
Comparative Study
Utilization and Outcomes of Local Anesthesia and Peripheral Nerve Block for Hybrid Lower Extremity Revascularization.
Purpose: To investigate the utilization of local anesthesia or peripheral nerve block with monitored anesthesia care (LPMAC) and its impact on the perioperative outcomes of hybrid lower extremity revascularization (LER) compared with general anesthesia (GA). Materials and Methods: A search of the ACS-NSQIP database between 2005 and 2017 identified 9430 patients who underwent hybrid LER for peripheral artery disease. Excluding 449 ineligible cases left 8981 hybrid LER patients for analysis. ⋯ Conclusion: LPMAC is an infrequent anesthetic technique for hybrid LER and is primarily used for patients with a high burden of comorbidities. LPMAC is associated with reduced overall morbidity and operating time. Further studies are needed to identify which patients undergoing hybrid LER benefit most from LPMAC.