Articles: emergency-services.
-
The number 1 reason children 15 years of age and younger present to the emergency department is fever. To successfully address this common chief complaint, a consistent message must be sent by all health care team members. ⋯ In addition, treatment of fever must be evidence based with a goal of comfort rather than normothermia. Nurses must address caregivers' concerns and consider the age, medical history, and clinical presentation of the child with fever when determining the appropriate triage level and management.
-
Abdominal pain is the most common reason for visit (RFV) to the emergency department (ED) for adults, yet no standardized diagnostic pathway exists for abdominal pain. Optimal management is age-specific; symptoms, diagnoses, and prognoses differ between young and old adults. Availability and knowledge of the effectiveness of various imaging modalities have also changed over time. We compared diagnostic imaging rates for younger versus older adults to identify practice patterns of abdominal imaging across age groups over time. ⋯ Despite more abdominal pain ED visits and increased imaging rates per visit, test positivity continues to rise. Our findings do not support claims that CT and ultrasound are being used less appropriately over time, but demonstrate widespread use of X-rays, which are potentially ineffective for abdominal pain.
-
A growing number of individuals with unmet mental health needs in the United States rely on emergency medical services during mental health crises, and 9-1-1 emergency medical dispatchers (EMD) are often a critical lifeline to help. Unfortunately, current industry-standard dispatching protocols and training required for EMD certification largely lack specificity for managing 9-1-1 calls related to mental health emergencies. The purpose of this report is to illustrate the value of additional targeted training for EMDs that enables them to more effectively assist callers struggling with mental illness or suicidal thoughts. ⋯ Key principles and phrasing from the training were used successfully by the EMD to dissuade the caller from self-harm, and he was ultimately safely met by first responders on scene and transported for care. We also share post-call recollections and reactions from the EMD to demonstrate how in addition to reducing risks for callers and their families, EMHD training has the potential to reduce on-scene risks for field responders and may increase confidence and mitigate negative stress responses in EMDs. Emergency medical services systems in the United States should continue to explore enhanced training and protocols to improve care for 9-1-1 callers experiencing mental health crises.
-
This is a retrospective study that examines the risk of non-COVID-19 respiratory infection (RI)-related emergency department (ED) visits and hospitalizations among autistic adults. The study compares these findings to non-autistic adults using the 2018 Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project Nationwide Emergency Department Sample. ⋯ Individuals with autism were more likely to experience emergency department visits and hospitalizations because of respiratory infections than individuals without autism. Amid growing evidence of the disproportionate impact of COVID-19 on the autistic population, the study findings highlight a broader, pre-existing burden of respiratory infections among adults with autism in the U.S. that extend beyond the recent pandemic.
-
We previously implemented the SQuID protocol (subcutaneous insulin in diabetic ketoacidosis [DKA]) demonstrating safe, effective treatment of low- to moderate-severity DKA in a non-intensive care unit setting. Since success and sustainability of interventions rely on staff buy-in, we assessed acceptability of SQuID among emergency department (ED) and inpatient clinicians. ⋯ Acceptability was high across clinician types; 65% of ED clinicians preferred SQuID to IV insulin. Clinicians liked SQuID (affective attitude), found it easy to use (burden), were confident in its use (self-efficacy), felt that it improved outcomes (perceived effectiveness), found that it was fair to patients (ethicality), found that it made sense (intervention coherence), and found that it did not interfere with other activities (opportunity cost).