Articles: hematoma.
-
Journal of neurosurgery · Mar 2024
Meta AnalysisMiddle meningeal artery embolization as standalone treatment versus combined with surgical evacuation for chronic subdural hematomas: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Middle meningeal artery embolization (MMAE) is a novel treatment for chronic subdural hematomas (cSDHs) with high variability of use across practitioners and institutions. This study sought to investigate whether standalone MMAE may be an effective alternative to combined MMAE and surgery for select patients with cSDH. ⋯ Standalone MMAE for cSDH may yield a low rate of surgical recurrence, which may be comparable to that of combined MMAE and surgery. However, studies in this systematic review and meta-analysis were primarily single-arm studies prone to treatment bias. Future studies are needed to further investigate whether standalone MMAE may be an effective alternative to combined MMAE and surgical treatment for cSDH in select patients.
-
Subdural hematoma (SDH) patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) require renal replacement therapy in addition to neurological management. We sought to determine whether continuous venovenous hemodialysis (CVVHD) or intermittent hemodialysis (iHD) is associated with higher rates of SDH re-expansion as well as morbidity and mortality. ⋯ CVVHD was independently associated with decreased risk of neurologically significant SDH expansion. Therefore, receiving renal replacement therapy through a course of CVVHD may increase SDH stability in patients with ESRD.
-
Research on variables associated with chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH) resolution following middle meningeal artery embolization (MMAE) is limited. This study investigated the clinical utility of age-adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index (ACCI) and modified 5-item Frailty Index (mFI - 5) for predicting cSDH resolution following MMAE. ⋯ ACCI and mFI - 5 moderately predict MMAE resolution and may aid in medical decision-making.
-
Patients with subdural hemorrhage (SDH) and a Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score of 13-15 are typically categorized as having mild traumatic brain injury. We hypothesize that patients without a maximum GCS score - specifically, patients with GCS scores of 13 and 14 - may exhibit poorer neurological outcomes. ⋯ Among SDH patients with mild TBI, those with GCS scores of 13-14 exhibited poorer neurological outcomes than those with a maximum GCS score. The thickness of the SDH is positively associated with neurological disability in SDH patients with a maximum GCS score.