Articles: nausea.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
A double-blind randomised cross-over comparison of nabilone and metoclopramide in the control of radiation-induced nausea.
Forty patients who were suffering from radiation induced emesis were entered into a prospectively randomised double-blind cross-over study comparing nabilone with metoclopramide. Only patients who had at least five treatments remaining of their planned course of irradiation were randomised, in order to allow an adequate time to monitor the degree of symptom control and any adverse effects of the two drugs. Patient characteristics and the incidence and severity of nausea and vomiting were similar for the two groups. There was no difference in the efficacy of the two drugs but the incidence and severity of adverse reactions was significantly greater in those patients who received nabilone.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Aug 1987
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialNitrous oxide does not increase the incidence of nausea and vomiting after isoflurane anesthesia.
A total of 110 patients undergoing elective abdominal hysterectomy were anesthetized in random order with either isoflurane in nitrous oxide and oxygen or isoflurane in air and oxygen. Fentanyl was used as an adjunct to isoflurane in all patients, 0.05 mg every 45 min. ⋯ Patients who had had nausea or vomiting after previous anesthetics had nausea or vomiting significantly more frequently than patients who did not. It is concluded that nitrous oxide does not contribute to the occurrence of nausea or vomiting after isoflurane anesthesia for gynecologic laparotomies.
-
Nausea and vomiting continue to be critical problems in cancer chemotherapy, although considerable progress has been made toward understanding the neuropharmacological mechanisms of vomiting and how chemotherapeutic agents and antiemetics affect these mechanisms. The principles of behavioural psychology have also been applied in an effort to understand and effectively manage these complications which have potentially serious consequences. For example, there is now some degree of rationality to our use of metoclopramide for cisplatin-induced nausea and vomiting, the use of combination antiemetic regimens, and use of lorazepam for the prevention (albeit unproven) of anticipatory nausea and vomiting. ⋯ The role of behavioural therapies, which have been shown to be effective particularly in children and in anticipatory nausea and vomiting, needs to be more firmly established. Rather than recommending a given antiemetic programme for any particular chemotherapy, it is preferable to think in terms of initial approaches and how they can be modified. No one antiemetic programme is effective or safe in all situations.
-
AH 25086 B is a selective agonist of the newly determined 5-HT(1) receptors, which are sited mainly in the intracranial section of the carotid artery. According to experimental studies, the effect of AH 25086 B is decidedly more highly selective than that of ergotamine; the blood flow through the arteriovenous anastomoses of the internal carotid artery is clearly reduced, while the blood flow through the capillaries supplying the brain is increased. With AH 25086 B administered in an infusion rapid abolition of migraine attacks already in progress proved possible. ⋯ On average it took 31 min (range 10-60 min) for the headache to be relieved, regardless of the duration of migraine symptoms before the start of treatment. This was not a controlled study, but the results (14 very good, 6 good or satisfactory, in 21 attacks treated) were better than could have been expected by chance. Tolerance of the preparation was good, all side-effects being transitory and mild; with dosages up to 1.6 mug kg(-1) min(-1) no changes were seen in heart rate or blood pressure.