• Mohamed Abdihalim, Masaki Watanabe, Saqib A Chaudhry, Bharati Jagadeesan, M Fareed K Suri, and Adnan I Qureshi.
• Zeenat Qureshi Stroke Research Center, Minneapolis, MN.
• J Neuroimaging. 2014 Mar 1;24(2):171-5.

BackgroundRecurrence following endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysm is attributed to either coil compaction or aneurysm growth but these processes have not been studied as distinct processes.MethodsThe pixel size of the coil mass and aneurysm sac, and the adjacent parent artery were measured and expressed as a ratio to the pixel size of the parent vessel diameter on immediate post-procedure and follow-up angiograms. Increase of aneurysm area or decrease in coil mass of 30% or greater on follow-up angiogram was used to define "significant" aneurysm growth and coil compaction, respectively.ResultsEleven patients had coil compaction, 14 patients had significant aneurysm growth and 4 patients had small aneurysm regrowth. Retreatment was performed in the 14 patients with "significant" aneurysm regrowth and 8 of the 11 patients with coil compaction at mean follow of 11 months (range 5-20 months) following the initial procedure. There were no events of new aneurysmal rupture in either 11 patients with coil compaction or 14 patients with significant aneurysm regrowth over a mean follow-up period of 22 months (range of 9-42 months).ConclusionThis is one of the first studies to differentiate coil compaction and aneurysm growth as distinct etiologies for aneurysm recurrence.Copyright © 2013 by the American Society of Neuroimaging.

25 keywords...

hide…