• D Wautier and E Thienpont.
• Department of Orthopedic Surgery, CHU UCL Namur, Godinne, Avenue Docteur Gaston Therasse 1, 5530, Yvoir, Belgium. Delphine.wautier@chuuclnamur.uclouvain.be.
• Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024 Jan 1; 144 (1): 323332323-332.

IntroductionThe purpose of this retrospective study was to study the effect of tibial implant design on the occurrence of radiolucent lines (RLLs) and aseptic loosening (AL) by comparing two different total knee arthroplasty (TKA) designs.Materials And MethodsTwo types of total knee arthroplasty, different for tibial shape, size and keel design were compared, 255 for the first and 774 for the second. The occurrence of RLLs and radiological signs of micro- and macro-mobility and aseptic loosening was analyzed. Demographic data were compared, as well as the type and rate of RLLs, occurrence of aseptic loosening and the presence of potential risk factors.ResultsThe first implant design is morphometric and has a squarer keel than the second implant TKA. The overall rate of RLLs was similar (21% vs 23%), despite of a significantly lower rates of radiological signs of macro-mobility of the tibial component with the first implant (2% vs 17%). Survivorship of both designs was overall comparable (99.6% vs 98.8 %) the first implant group had more potential risk factors for poor bone quality than the second group (p < 0.05).ConclusionA morphometric design is more anatomic and offers better bone coverage of the epiphyseal tibial surface. RLLs, as a sign of implant micro-mobility, were equally present in both designs. Radiological signs of macro-mobility at the metaphysis were less frequently observed in squared keel design. The morphometric implant did not show improved survivorship compared with a symmetric implant.Level Of EvidenceIII.© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

17 keywords...

hide…