Spine
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study
Cost-utility analysis of physiotherapy treatment compared with physiotherapy advice in low back pain.
Economic evaluation alongside a pragmatic multicenter randomized controlled trial from the National Health Service (NHS) and societal perspective. ⋯ The results indicate no significant differences in either NHS costs or effects. However, the significantly higher out-of-pocket expenses incurred by patients receiving routine physiotherapy suggests that advice given by a physiotherapist should be considered as the first-line treatment for patients with this level of back pain disability.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial
Clinical outcomes of 3 fusion methods through the posterior approach in the lumbar spine.
This prospective randomized study compared 3 fusion methods: posterolateral fusion (PLF), posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF), and PLIF combined with PLF (PLF+PLIF). ⋯ No significant differences in clinical results and union rates were found among the 3 fusion methods. PLIF had better sagittal balance than PLF. PLIF without PLF had advantages of the elimination of donor site pain, shorter operating time, and less blood loss.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial
Effect of prone positioning systems on hemodynamic and cardiac function during lumbar spine surgery: an echocardiographic study.
Prospective randomized study of patients undergoing spine surgery. ⋯ Adequate fluid replacement reduced hypotension and hemodynamic instability after prone positioning. The Jackson spine table and longitudinal bolsters had minimal effects on cardiac function, and should be considered in patients with limited cardiac reserve.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study Comparative Study
Revisability of the CHARITE artificial disc replacement: analysis of 688 patients enrolled in the U.S. IDE study of the CHARITE Artificial Disc.
A prospective, randomized, multicenter, FDA-regulated Investigational Device Exemption clinical trial. ⋯ Lumbar TDR with the CHARITE Artificial Disc did not preclude any further procedures at the index level during primary insertion, with nearly one third being revisable to a new motion-preserving prosthesis and just over two thirds being successfully converted to ALIF and/ or posterior pedicle screw arthrodesis, the original alternative procedure.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study
A randomized controlled trial investigating the efficiency of musculoskeletal physiotherapy on chronic low back disorder.
Randomized, single blind, controlled trial. ⋯ As a component of musculoskeletal physiotherapy, the spinal stabilization program is more effective than manually applied therapy or an education booklet in treating chronic low back disorder over time. Both manual therapy and the spinal stabilization program are significantly effective in pain reduction in comparison to an active control. To our knowledge and up until now, this result has not been shown in patients with chronic low back disorder.