Spine
-
Systematic review of the literature and consensus recommendations by an international expert focus group. ⋯ Patients with ES and OS are currently managed with multiple modalities involving surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy. For both histopathologies, advances in chemotherapy have led to the greatest improvements in survival over the last few decades. Neoadjuvant therapy portents the most favorable local control and long-term survival. En bloc surgical resection may improve overall survival and decrease risk of recurrence.
-
A retrospective histologic evaluation of biopsies obtained during percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) procedures as treatment for presumed osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. ⋯ Obtaining bone biopsies during PVPs does not lead to increased morbidity and can verify the pathologic process underlying the vertebral compression fractures. Since this study showed an unsuspected malignancy rate of 3.8%, we recommend routine obtainment of a vertebral body bone biopsy, preferably using a biopsy needle with a diameter larger than 14 Gauge (>2.1 mm/0.083 inch), during every PVP procedure.
-
Technical note. ⋯ This technique greatly supports surgeons inexperienced in the anterior approach to the upper cervical spine or surgeons at revision surgery who may be lost in and daunted by an unfamiliar operation field surrounded by important structures. Although an anterior approach to the upper cervical spine in the patient with O-C fusion may rarely be required, this application should be considered.
-
Retrospective radiographic review. ⋯ Although disc height, translational motion, and angular variation are significantly affected at the level of a disc herniation, no significant changes are apparent in adjacent segments. Our results indicate that herniated discs have no effect on ROM at adjacent levels regardless of the degree of disc degeneration or the size of disc herniation, suggesting that the natural progression of disc degeneration and adjacent segment disease may be separate, unrelated processes within the cervical spine.
-
Systematic review of literature. ⋯ There is very low quality evidence to support the superiority of one approach over another. There is a strong recommendation for posterior or posterior-lateral approach from T2 through T5. For the T6-L5 regions of the spine we recommend either anterior, posterior, or combined anterior and posterior surgery depending on the clinical presentation, surgeon and patient preference.