Anaesthesia
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Comparison of sevoflurane and propofol with rocuronium for modified rapid-sequence induction of anaesthesia.
We compared the use of sevoflurane and propofol with three different doses of rocuronium for modified rapid-sequence induction of anaesthesia. One hundred and forty adult patients were randomly allocated to have a rapid-sequence intravenous induction with propofol 2-3 mg.kg-1 (group P) or an inhalational induction with sevoflurane 8% in oxygen, using a vital capacity technique (group S). Following loss of the eyelash reflex, cricoid pressure was applied and 20 patients in each group were administered rocuronium 0.3 (groups P/0.3 and S/0.3), 0.45 (groups P/0.45 and S/0.45) or 0.6 (groups P/0.6 and S/0.6) mg.kg-1. ⋯ Intubating conditions were acceptable in one patient and no patient, respectively, following induction with sevoflurane and propofol without the muscle relaxant. The conditions were acceptable in 30, 55 and 90% of subjects with sevoflurane induction, and in 45, 80 and 90% of subjects with propofol induction following 0.3, 0.45 and 0.6 mg.kg-1 of rocuronium, respectively (no significant difference for each dose of rocuronium). The present study shows that intubating conditions during a rapid-sequence induction using rocuronium 0.6 mg.kg-1 following induction of anaesthesia with sevoflurane or propofol are similar.
-
The cortical responses to auditory stimuli were studied in 12 patients during isoflurane anaesthesia producing burst suppression (ETisof (SD) 1.4 (0.2) vol.%). Earphones were used to give 3-s trains of auditory click stimuli (60 clicks, 20 clicks per second, 80 dB, 0.1 ms) at irregular intervals. ⋯ The latency of these auditory offset evoked bursts was 540 (60) ms. Auditory offset evoked bursts suggest that in spite of cortical suppression during deep anaesthesia the brain retains its ability to respond to changes in the acoustic environment.