Anaesthesia
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Comparison of sevoflurane and propofol with rocuronium for modified rapid-sequence induction of anaesthesia.
We compared the use of sevoflurane and propofol with three different doses of rocuronium for modified rapid-sequence induction of anaesthesia. One hundred and forty adult patients were randomly allocated to have a rapid-sequence intravenous induction with propofol 2-3 mg.kg-1 (group P) or an inhalational induction with sevoflurane 8% in oxygen, using a vital capacity technique (group S). Following loss of the eyelash reflex, cricoid pressure was applied and 20 patients in each group were administered rocuronium 0.3 (groups P/0.3 and S/0.3), 0.45 (groups P/0.45 and S/0.45) or 0.6 (groups P/0.6 and S/0.6) mg.kg-1. ⋯ Intubating conditions were acceptable in one patient and no patient, respectively, following induction with sevoflurane and propofol without the muscle relaxant. The conditions were acceptable in 30, 55 and 90% of subjects with sevoflurane induction, and in 45, 80 and 90% of subjects with propofol induction following 0.3, 0.45 and 0.6 mg.kg-1 of rocuronium, respectively (no significant difference for each dose of rocuronium). The present study shows that intubating conditions during a rapid-sequence induction using rocuronium 0.6 mg.kg-1 following induction of anaesthesia with sevoflurane or propofol are similar.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
The use of tramadol following day--case oral surgery.
This prospective, randomised double-blinded study was designed to assess the analgesic efficacy and occurrence of nausea when tramadol is added to a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug to provide analgesia following day-case third molar teeth extraction. All patients received oral diclofenac pre-operatively and one of four treatments intra-operatively: fentanyl and metoclopramide, tramadol and metoclopramide, fentanyl and ondansetron, or tramadol and ondansetron. ⋯ There were no significant differences in the incidence of pain or nausea in the following 24 h. We conclude that the addition of tramadol to diclofenac results in no useful improvement in analgesic effect, and that the use of ondansetron fails to reduce the nausea associated with tramadol.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Influence of induction of anaesthesia on intubating conditions one minute after rocuronium administration: comparison of ketamine and thiopentone.
We compared the effect of thiopentone and ketamine on intubating conditions after rocuronium 0.6 mg.kg-1 in two groups of patients (n = 16 each), aged 21-44 years, undergoing elective surgery. Premedication consisted of alprazolam 1 mg by mouth 1 h before surgery. All patients received midazolam 2 mg intravenously 2 min before intravenous administration of thiopentone 5 mg.kg-1 or ketamine 2.5 mg.kg-1. ⋯ Jaw relaxation was similar in both groups but vocal cord conditions were better and the diaphragmatic response less marked in the ketamine group compared with the thiopentone group (p = 0.002). The degree of neuromuscular block [% decrease of T1, mean (SD)] at the time of intubation was similar: 51.8 (25)% (ketamine group) and 54.3 (23.1)% (thiopentone group). We conclude that ketamine 2.5 mg.kg-1 provides better intubating conditions than thiopentone 5 mg.kg-1 1 min after administration of rocuronium 0.6 mg.kg-1.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Prophylactic anti-emetic efficacy of ondansetron in laparoscopic cholecystectomy under total intravenous anaesthesia. A randomised, double-blind comparison with droperidol, metoclopramide and placebo.
The prophylactic anti-emetic efficacy and safety of pre-operative intravenous ondansetron was evaluated in a randomised, double-blind, comparison with droperidol, metoclopramide and placebo in 160 ASA grade 1 and 2 patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy under total intravenous anaesthesia. The patients were randomly allocated to receive ondansetron (4 mg), droperidol (1.25 mg), metoclopramide (10 mg) or placebo given as a single intravenous dose immediately before induction of a standardised general anaesthetic. There were no significant differences between the four study groups with regard to the demographic and anaesthetic data, postoperative analgesia, postoperative sedation scores, duration of postoperative hospital stay and incidence of adverse events. ⋯ The incidence of nausea was similar in the four groups in the other study periods: 0-1 h and 4-24 h. The incidence of vomiting was lower in the ondansetron, droperidol and metoclopramide groups than in the placebo group between 1 and 4 h but was the same between 4 and 24 h. As a result of the lower incidence of nausea and vomiting between 1 h and 4 h in the ondansetron group, the overall incidence of nausea and vomiting was lower during the first 24 h after surgery in this group than in the other three groups.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
Prevention of needle-stick injury. Efficacy of a safeguarded intravenous cannula.
One possible method of reducing the incidence of needle-stick injury is to use needles with safeguard mechanisms. The needle of the Insyte AutoGuard intravenous cannula can be retracted into the safety barrel. One hundred patients were randomly allocated to receive either an 18-gauge conventional Insyte intravenous cannula (group C) or the AutoGuard cannula (group AG) to assess the ease of use and efficacy of the AutoGuard device. ⋯ Handling the withdrawn needle was judged significantly safer in group AG than in group C (p < 0.001). Blood contamination often occurred where a withdrawn needle was placed in group C, whereas no blood stain was detected in any case in group AG (p < 0.001). The AutoGuard cannula provides safer handling of a withdrawn needle without reducing its ease of insertion.