Articles: analgesics.
-
Thirty patients who had undergone elective anterolateral thoracotomy were studied in the surgical intensive care unit to compare the analgesic effectiveness of i.v. self-administered buprenorphine (group A) with that of epidural administration (group B) and of s.c. administration by a nurse of 0.3 mg buprenorphine every 3-4 h (group C, controls). Every 2 h the patients were asked to record their subjektive pain level as a percentage on an analogue scale: zero was to be used for no pain and 100% for the most severe pain they could imagine. the mean of all analogue scores for pain in the first 36 h was 19.4+/-3.1 for group A; 18.4+/-2.3 for group B and 42.0+/-7.4 for group C (P<0.025). When the mean scores were referred to time, it seemed that groups A and B suffered a little more pain immediately after the operation; however, after 4 h the mean scores for these groups were far lower than that for the control group. ⋯ Nurses should be instructed to provide analgesic medication on demand. Epidural administration of buprenorphine is superior to self-administration in terms of the amount of drugs used and the dosing intervals. In the quality of analgesia epidural administration and self-administration are equal and superior to the control procedure.
-
Many studies have demonstrated that cancer pain can be relieved in most cases by suitable analgesic medication. Patients with a diagnosis of "intractable cancer pain", however, are referred to our pain clinic nearly every day. A retrospective study of 1140 patients was therefore performed to evaluate the pain mechanisms and whether analgesic pretreatment had been adequate. ⋯ The principal causes for the inadequacy of the analgesic pretreatment were: failure to prescribe analgesics (10% of the patients), irregular intake schedule or prolonged intervals between applications (66%), underdosage of nonopioid analgesics (27%) or opioids (42%), and withholding of nonopioid analgesics (30%), strong opioids (14%), or co-analgesic drugs (17%), although their prescription was indicated. The severe pain was thus caused in many patients by simple mistakes in the prescription of analgesics. Terms like "intractable" should be used with caution when referring to cancer pain because they are often unreflected and can make patients and physicians feel helpless or insecure.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Postoperative analgesic requirements following flumazenil administration.
The effect of flumazenil (RO 15-1788) on postoperative analgesic requirements was evaluated in 30 postoperative patients. This prospective investigation was a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in patients undergoing general anesthesia supplemented by midazolam and fentanyl or sufentanil. Patients received either flumazenil (n = 20) or placebo (n = 10) by random assignment. ⋯ MEs (flumazenil 4.1 +/- 3.8 mg vs. placebo 3.7 +/- 3.2 mg) were not significantly different (p = 0.57) when similar levels of consciousness were compared. The onset of pain was more rapid with flumazenil patients as evidenced by the first analgesic dose at 15.7 +/- 25.1 minutes for the flumazenil group versus 34.7 +/- 43.7 for the placebo group; however, these data were not statistically different (p = 0.144). These results suggest that flumazenil does not increase postoperative analgesic requirements during the immediate postanesthesia period; however, patients receiving flumazenil may experience an earlier onset of postoperative pain.
-
Physician education in cancer pain management is seriously deficient. Many problems occur with opioids simply because of therapeutic ignorance. Opioid side effects are best prevented by using morphine as the drug of first choice for severe pain. ⋯ Physicians need to be aware of how to transfer patients from one opioid to another or from one route of administration to another. Side effects common in clinical practice are constipation, nausea/vomiting, dry mouth, and sedation. The importance of the issues of tolerance, dependence, and respiratory depression have been exaggerated.
-
The antinociceptive interaction on the tail flick (TF) and hot plate (HP) tests between opioid analgesics and medetomidine after intravenous (iv) or intrathecal administration were examined by isobolographic analysis. Male Sprague-Dawley rats received fixed ratios of medetomidine to morphine, fentanyl, and meperidine of 1:10 and 1:30, 10:1, and 1:3, respectively, by iv administration or 10:1, 3:1 and 10:1, and 1:3 by intrathecal administration, respectively. Data were expressed as the percentage maximal possible effect (%MPE). ⋯ These data confirmed that the interaction between medetomidine and opioids in producing antinociception may be additive or synergistic, depending on the route of administration, drug ratio administered, and level of processing of the nociceptive input (i.e., spinal vs. supraspinal). Moreover, these results were consistent with a spinal role for alpha-2 adrenoceptors in mediating antinociception. The authors suggest that the interaction between the opioid and alpha-2 adrenergic receptors occurs within the spinal cord.