Articles: checklist.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial
Experimental studies to improve the reliability and validity of regulatory judgments on health care in the Netherlands: a randomized controlled trial and before and after case study.
We examined the effect of two interventions on both the reliability and validity of regulatory judgments: adjusting the regulatory instrument and attending a consensus meeting. ⋯ Participating in a consensus meeting improved reliability and validity. Increasing the number of inspectors resulted in both higher reliability and validity values. Organizing consensus meetings and increasing the number of inspectors per regulatory visit seem to be valuable interventions for improving regulatory judgments.
-
Observational Study
Low-fidelity simulation improves mastery of the aseptic technique for labour epidurals: an observational study.
The objective of this study was to determine the impact of a low-fidelity simulation model on mastering the sterile technique during placement of epidural catheters. ⋯ This study describes a comprehensive teaching model for mastering the sterile technique during epidural catheter placement. It suggests that low-fidelity simulation improves the learning process when used in addition to conventional teaching.
-
Observational Study
Multifaceted interventions improve adherence to the surgical checklist.
Adherence to surgical safety checklists remains challenging. Our institution demonstrated acceptable rates of checklist utilization but poor adherence to all checkpoints. We hypothesized that stepwise, multifaceted interventions would improve checklist adherence. ⋯ A strategic, multifaceted approach to perioperative safety significantly improved checklist adherence over 2 years. Checklist content and process need to reflect local interests and operative flow to achieve high adherence rates. Successful checklist implementation requires efforts to change the safety culture, stakeholder buy-in, and sustained efforts over time.