Articles: checklist.
-
Review Meta Analysis
Impact of the WHO Surgical Safety Checklist Relative to Its Design and Intended Use: A Systematic Review and Meta-Meta-Analysis.
The aim of this study was to identify what parts of the World Health Organization Surgical Safety Checklist (WHO SSC) are working, what can be done to make it more effective, and to determine if it achieved its intended effect relative to its design and intended use. ⋯ The WHO SSC positively impacts the things it was explicitly designed to address and does not positively impact things it was not explicitly designed for.
-
To define a standardized methodology for establishing benchmarks for relevant outcomes in surgery. ⋯ This multinational Delphi survey represents the first expert-led process for developing a standardized approach for establishing benchmarks for relevant outcome measures in surgery. The provided consensual checklist customizes the methodology of outcome reporting in surgery and thus improves reproducibility and comparability of data and should ultimately serve to improve quality of care.
-
We aimed to appraise the evidence relating to the measurement properties of unidimensional tools to quantify pain after surgery. Furthermore, we wished to identify the tools used to assess interference of pain with functional recovery. ⋯ PROSPERO CRD42020213495.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial
A Health Economic Evaluation of the World Health Organization Surgical Safety Checklist: A Single Center Assessment.
To evaluate cost-effectiveness of the WHO Surgical Safety Checklist. ⋯ Implementation of the WHO checklist was a cost-effective strategy for improving surgical safety.
-
Comparative Study
A retrospective audit of postoperative days alive and out of hospital, including before and after implementation of the WHO surgical safety checklist.
We implemented the World Health Organization surgical safety checklist at Auckland City Hospital from November 2007. We hypothesised that the checklist would reduce postoperative mortality and increase days alive and out of hospital, both measured to 90 postoperative days. We compared outcomes for cohorts who had surgery during 18-month periods before vs. after checklist implementation. ⋯ Māori spent on average (95%CI) 1.1 (0.5-1.7) fewer days alive and out of hospital than non-Māori, p < 0.001. In conclusion, our patients experienced improving postoperative outcomes from 2004 to 2013, including the periods before and after implementation of the surgical checklist. Māori patients had worse outcomes than non-Māori.