Articles: checklist.
-
Checklists to guide critical procedures are becoming an increasingly important part of medical practice. These tools have proved effective in improving outcome in a variety of medical settings, including obstetrics. In this review, we outline essential principles of successful checklist creation and implementation and review our experience with checklist development in a worldwide, multi-institutional health care delivery system.
-
Following the overwhelming evidence of adverse events in hospital practice, the World Health Organization (WHO)'s World Alliance for Patient Safety has launched the 'Safe Surgery Saves Lives' campaign, which has developed a surgical safety checklist aimed to improve patient safety. The implementation of this checklist has met with mixed reactions in different institutions. Many countries have still not adopted its use. In this article, a brief review is presented regarding the role of the WHO checklist, barriers to its implementation and strategies for successful adoption.
-
Bmc Health Serv Res · Jan 2011
Review Comparative StudySystematic review of safety checklists for use by medical care teams in acute hospital settings--limited evidence of effectiveness.
Patient safety is a fundamental component of good quality health care. Checklists have been proposed as a method of improving patient safety. This systematic review, asked "In acute hospital settings, would the use of safety checklists applied by medical care teams, compared to not using checklists, improve patient safety?" ⋯ The included studies suggest some benefits of using safety checklists to improve protocol adherence and patient safety, but due to the risk of bias in these studies, their results should be interpreted with caution. More high quality and studies, are needed to enable confident conclusions about the effectiveness of safety checklists in acute hospital settings.
-
Reg Anesth Pain Med · Nov 2010
Review Comparative StudyMethodological quality of randomized controlled trials of postoperative epidural analgesia: validation of the Epidural Analgesia Trial Checklist as a specific instrument to evaluate methodology.
The overall benefits of epidural analgesia are controversial, in part because of the varying quality of methodology in published randomized controlled trials (RCTs). We performed a systematic review of available RCTs to examine the methodological quality of epidural analgesia trials. Current instruments for evaluating the quality of methodology are generic; thus, we also developed a specific assessment tool named Epidural Analgesia Trial Checklist (EATC). ⋯ Methodology scores for epidural analgesia RCTs have improved over time. The EATC seems to correlate well with other commonly used generic assessments for methodological RCT quality and be useful for assessing methodological quality of epidural RCTs. Future epidural analgesia RCTs should focus on improving appropriate description/definition of adverse effects, proper presentation of VAS pain scores, and assessment of VAS pain both at rest and with activity.
-
Various studies have shown that the use of a checklist in the operating room lowers mortality and morbidity related to the act of anaesthesia and surgery. The WHO launched a program in June 2008 to improve the safety of surgical care; the main point is the rational use of a simple tool: the Surgical Safety Checklist. ⋯ This checklist can of course be supplemented by other checklists specific from specialty teams or places but it can never be abridged or altered. The HAS provides for the promotion of the implementation of this checklist, the certification of health facilities with its introduction into the V2010 and accreditation of doctors.