Articles: dexmedetomidine.
-
Rev Bras Anestesiol · Sep 2002
[Dexmedetomidine and sufentanil as intraoperative analgesics: comparative study.].
The use of alpha2-agonists to control heart rate and blood pressure, to attenuate hemodynamic responses to tracheal intubation and extubation and to reduce anesthetics requirement are already well established in the literature since clonidine introduction for therapeutic use. Dexmedetomidine, recently approved for clinical use, presents more alpha2-adrenergic receptors selectively, and therefore less adverse effects combined with marked analgesic and sedative properties. This has raised the interest in using it to replace opioids, known for their potent analgesic and sedative properties. This study aimed at comparing dexmedetomidine and sufentanil analgesias during continuous infusion for ENT, head and neck procedures. ⋯ Dexmedetomidine as intraoperative analgesic was more effective as compared to sufentanil in the procedures selected for this study regarding hemodynamic stability, emergence and anesthetic recovery conditions.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Aug 2002
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialThe efficacy, side effects, and recovery characteristics of dexmedetomidine versus propofol when used for intraoperative sedation.
We evaluated the cardio-respiratory effects of equi-sedative doses of dexmedetomidine and propofol for intraoperative sedation. Secondary comparison end points were time to achieve and terminate sedation and postoperative analgesia and psychomotor performance. Forty patients scheduled for elective surgery provided informed consent and were randomized equally to receive either dexmedetomidine (1 microg/kg initial loading dose for 10 min; maintenance, 0.4-0.7 microg. kg(-1). h(-1)) or propofol (75 microg. kg(-1). min(-1) x 10 min; maintenance, 12.5-75 microg. kg(-1). min(-1)). Hemodynamic variables (heart rate and mean arterial blood pressure), sedation (visual analog scale and Observer Assessment of Alertness/Sedation), bispectral index score of sedation, ventilation (respiratory rate, O2 sat, and ETCO2), psychomotor performance (digital symbol substitution test), and pain (visual analog scale) were determined during surgery and up to 95 min after surgery. Intraoperative sedation levels were targeted to achieve a bispectral index score of 70-80. Patient demographics, ASA class, surgical procedure, and baseline cardio-respiratory variables were similar between groups. Sedation was achieved more rapidly with propofol but was similar between groups 25 min after initiating infusions. The average infusion rate for dexmedetomidine was 0.7 microg. kg(-1). h(-1) and 38 microg. kg(-1). min(-1) for propofol. There were no differences between groups in psychomotor performance and respiratory rate during recovery. The previous use of dexmedetomidine resulted in more sedation, lower blood pressure, and improved analgesia (less morphine use) in recovery. ⋯ Dexmedetomidine may be useful for perioperative sedation. It has a slower onset and offset of sedation compared with propofol. Dexmedetomidine was associated with improved analgesia and less morphine use in the postoperative period.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Aug 2002
Case ReportsTreatment of persistent tachycardia with dexmedetomidine during off-pump cardiac surgery.
After unsuccessful treatment of intraoperative tachycardia with esmolol during off-pump revascularization, heart rate was successfully reduced with a bolus and infusion of dexmedetomidine.
-
J Neurosurg Anesthesiol · Jul 2002
Dexmedetomidine may impair cognitive testing during endovascular embolization of cerebral arteriovenous malformations: a retrospective case report series.
After the reported successful use of dexmedetomidine to sedate patients in the intensive care unit without respiratory depression, we began to use dexmedetomidine for interventional neuroradiologic procedures. We report on five patients who had dexmedetomidine administered for sedation during embolization of cerebral arteriovenous malformations. All patients were comfortably sedated and breathing spontaneously. ⋯ They were still unable to undergo cognitive testing 45 minutes after the infusion was stopped. In contrast, 10 minutes after the discontinuation of the infusion of propofol, all patients were awake, alert, cooperative, and able to undergo cognitive testing without difficulty. In conclusion, on examination of five non-randomly selected case records, we found that dexmedetomidine significantly prevented neurologic and cognitive testing.