Articles: nerve-block.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Effect of needle size on success of transarterial axillary block.
The transarterial approach to brachial plexus block is a well-established method of producing anesthesia of the upper extremity. However, it is associated with a failure rate of 20% to 30%. Failure may be secondary to the common use of a relatively long needle, which can penetrate the posterior wall of the sheath and result in inadvertent injection of the local anesthetic into the surrounding tissue. ⋯ Success was defined as no discomfort at the time of incision. Success rates were compared using a chi 2 test, and a P value of less than .05 was considered significant. The overall success rate was significantly higher with the 26-gauge, 1/2-in needle (42/48 [88%]) than with the 22-gauge, 1 1/2-in needle (39/49 [69%]; P = .035).
-
Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir · Feb 2004
[Clinical experiences and dosage pattern in subcutaneous single-injection digital block technique].
100 patients with injuries to their fingers were treated using the subcutaneous digital block as described by Low et al.. Different dosages ranging from 2 to 3 millilitres of a local anesthetic were required to obtain appropriate anesthesia according to the location of injury. 108 finger injuries were treated, 18 thumb injuries, 90 finger injuries. The anesthetic was administered using a 0.55 x 25 mm needle and injected strictly subcutaneously into the flexor crease at the base of the finger or thumb. ⋯ Additionally, we performed a deep local nerve block (Oberst), if the patient still felt discomfort or pain. The severity or type of injury did not play a role according to our findings. The subcutaneous finger block as described by Low et al., therefore, is the method of choice treating injuries to the fingers and to the palmar aspect of the thumb, since it offers a decrease in the amount of anesthetic required and increases patient comfort.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Feb 2004
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialDoes a preemptive block of the great auricular nerve improve postoperative analgesia in children undergoing tympanomastoid surgery?
We performed a double-blinded randomized controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy of preemptive analgesia in children undergoing tympanomastoid surgery. Children were divided into two groups: group block-block (BB) received a preemptive great auricular nerve block (GAN-block) with 0.25% bupivacaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine before incision followed by a second GAN-block with 0.25% bupivacaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine 1 h before the end of the procedure. Group sham block-block (SB-B) received a preemptive GAN-block with normal saline before surgical incision followed by a GAN-block with 0.25% bupivacaine with 1:200000 epinephrine 1 h before the completion of the procedure. All patients were evaluated for pain with the objective pain score (OPS) by a blinded observer. There was no difference in pain rescue requirements in the postanesthesia care unit (BB versus SB-B, 1 of 20 versus 3 of 20, P= 0.60) or in the short-stay unit (BB versus SB-B, 5 of 20 versus 11 of 20, P = 0.107) or for the entire hospital stay (P = 0.20). There was no significant difference between groups in the time to first rescue pain medication (BB versus SB-B, 226 +/- 71 min versus 201 +/- 94 min). There was no significant difference between groups regarding vomiting in the postoperative period (P = 0.52). We conclude that a preoperative GAN-block does not offer significant advantages for postoperative pain relief in children undergoing tympanomastoid surgery. ⋯ This double-blinded randomized controlled trial compared the efficacy of preemptive analgesia with a peripheral nerve block of the great auricular nerve for decreasing postoperative pain in children undergoing tympanomastoid surgery. Preemptive analgesia did not improve the quality or duration of postoperative analgesia in our cohort.
-
Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim · Feb 2004
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial[Sciatic nerve block with 1% mepivacaine for foot surgery: posterior versus lateral approach to the popliteal fossa].
To compare the efficacy and feasibility of the sciatic nerve block performed using either a posterior or a lateral approach to the popliteal fossa, taking into consideration patient comfort during puncture and postoperative analgesia. ⋯ The lateral approach to the block of the sciatic nerve in the popliteal fossa provides analgesia comparable to that obtained with the posterior approach, with a faster onset and longer postoperative duration.