Articles: hyperalgesia.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Jan 1999
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialPeripheral antihyperalgesic effect of morphine to heat, but not mechanical, stimulation in healthy volunteers after ultraviolet-B irradiation.
The objective of this study was to evaluate direct peripheral analgesic effects of morphine using a peripheral model of hyperalgesia and the technique of IV regional anesthesia (IVRA), thus allowing the differentiation between central and peripheral mechanisms of action. Two spots on the ventral sides of both forearms in 12 volunteers were irradiated with ultraviolet (UV)-B to induce thermal and mechanical hyperalgesia. One day after the induction of the inflammatory reaction, 40 mL of morphine hydrochloride 0.01% was administered via IVRA. Calibrated heat and phasic mechanical stimuli were applied to differentially determine impairments of tactile and nociceptive perception. Touch and phasic mechanical stimuli of noxious intensity to normal skin did not reveal altered responsiveness caused by morphine. In contrast, the administration of morphine significantly increased heat pain thresholds in the UV-B-pretreated skin areas. The peripheral antihyperalgesic effects of morphine were demonstrated only in inflamed skin areas. Direct central analgesic effects were ruled out by the lack of measurable plasma concentrations of morphine and its metabolites. Morphine 0.01% significantly diminished thermal, but not mechanical, hyperalgesia by a peripheral mode of action, which suggests inhibition of effector pathways leading to heat, but not mechanical, sensitization. ⋯ The peripheral analgesic effects of morphine were studied using modified IV regional anesthesia. When administered 1 day after the induction of dermal inflammation, morphine 0.01% diminished heat, but not primary mechanical, hyperalgesia. Therefore, suppression of mechanical hyperalgesia seen in previous studies could be predominantly due to inhibition of secondary (central) mechanical hyperalgesia.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
Low-dose lidocaine suppresses experimentally induced hyperalgesia in humans.
The antinociceptive effects of systemically administered local anesthetics have been shown in various conditions, such as neuralgia, polyneuropathy, fibromyalgia, and postoperative pain. The objective of the study was to identify the peripheral mechanisms of action of low-dose local anesthetics in a model of experimental pain. ⋯ Increasing painfulness during sustained pinching has been attributed to excitation and simultaneous sensitization of particular Adelta- and C-nociceptors. This hyperalgesic mechanism seems to be particularly sensitive to low concentrations of lidocaine. These findings confirm clinical experience with lidocaine in pain states dominated by hyperalgesia.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Sep 1998
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialIntrathecal, but not intravenous, clonidine reduces experimental thermal or capsaicin-induced pain and hyperalgesia in normal volunteers.
Clonidine is approved for intraspinal administration in the treatment of neuropathic cancer pain. Some studies have suggested an analgesic effect after systemic clonidine administration. The purpose of this study was to compare the analgesic effects of intrathecal and IV clonidine with acute noxious stimulation and with hyperalgesia from intradermal capsaicin injection in volunteers. Sixteen healthy volunteers received intradermal injections of capsaicin (100 microg) before and after the IV or intrathecal injection of clonidine 50 or 150 microg in a randomized, double-blind manner. Pain and areas of mechanical hyperalgesia and allodynia were determined at specified intervals. In addition, pain to noxious heat stimulation was determined. The capsaicin injection produced pain, followed by hyperalgesia and allodynia. The intrathecal, but not IV, injection of 150 microg of clonidine reduced capsaicin-induced pain and area of hyperalgesia. Intrathecal clonidine (150 microg) reduced pain to heat stimulation, whereas IV clonidine did not. The groups did not differ in hemodynamic or sedative effects from clonidine. These data support the value of intraspinal administration of clonidine for the treatment of acute pain and of pain states associated with hyperalgesia. Similarly, they suggest that analgesia from the systemic administration of this alpha2-adrenergic agonist, if any, is weak in doses that produce sedation and reduce blood pressure. ⋯ To the extent that the experimental pain conditions used in this study reflect those in patients with acute and chronic pain, these data support the spinal rather than IV injection of clonidine for analgesia.
-
J Pain Symptom Manage · Jul 1998
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialThe human capsaicin model of allodynia and hyperalgesia: sources of variability and methods for reduction.
Intradermal and topical application of capsaicin have been used to study mechanisms of mechanical allodynia (MA) and pinprick hyperalgesia (PPH) and the efficacy of drugs in relieving these symptoms. However, it is associated with significant inter- and intra-subject variability. In order to improve the model's sensitivity, we examined several potential sources of variability of capsaicin-evoked MA and PPH in healthy volunteers, including skin temperature fluctuations, method (intradermal vs. topical) and site (volar forearm vs. foot dorsum) of administration. ⋯ However, greater intra-subject consistency (MA: foot: r = 0.84; arm: r = 0.49; PPH: r = 0.87; r = 0.39) and significantly larger areas of MA (15.8 +/- 4.2 vs 9.1 +/- 2.5, p < 0.05) were seen with the foot. (PPH: foot: 28.9 +/- 6.7; arm: 21.6 +/- 4.2, NS). Large variability exists among subjects receiving CAP, with some developing minimal MA. However, these subjects may be screened out prior to entry, increasing the sensitivity of the model, which may be further improved by clamping the skin temperature.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
Effects of antihyperalgesic drugs on experimentally induced hyperalgesia in man.
In a double-blind, cross-over study, ibuprofen (600 mg), a peripherally-acting selective kappa-opioid receptor agonist (7.5 mg), or placebo were given orally in experiments on healthy volunteers 1 h before assessment of pain thresholds to radiant heat and of pain ratings to controlled mechanical impact stimuli. Mechanical and thermal hyperalgesia had been induced 24 h before by irradiating skin patches on the ventral side of the upper leg. UVB irradiation induced mechanical and thermal hyperalgesia at radiation dosages of three times the minimal erythema dose. ⋯ In contrast, the kappa-agonist showed no antihyperalgesic efficacy in the chosen models. It is concluded that the UVB model, as the pinch model, is suitable for establishing antihyperalgesic effects of NSAIDs, but probably not of kappa-receptor agonists, in healthy human volunteers. Compared to the pinch stimulus model, the UVB model offers additional advantages: (a) drugs may be tested after induction of the skin trauma by UV and this situation is more similar to the clinical use of antihyperalgesic drugs. (b) Since mechanical and thermal hyperalgesia is induced by UVB, drug effects can be tested upon both forms of hyperalgesia.